Skip to content

[clang] Implement P3144R2 "Deleting a Pointer to an Incomplete Type..." #97733

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 5, 2024

Conversation

Endilll
Copy link
Contributor

@Endilll Endilll commented Jul 4, 2024

This patch implements (not yet published) P3144R2 "Deleting a Pointer to an Incomplete Type Should be Ill-formed". Wording changes (not yet merged into the working draft) read:

7.6.2.9 [expr.delete] Delete
If the object being deleted has incomplete class type at the point of deletion and the complete class has a
non-trivial destructor or a deallocation function, the behavior is undefined
, the program is ill-formed.

We preserve status quo of emitting a warning when deleting a pointer to incomplete type up to, and including, C++23, but make it ill-formed since C++26. Same goes for deleting pointers to void, which has been allowed as an extension.

@Endilll Endilll added clang:frontend Language frontend issues, e.g. anything involving "Sema" c++26 labels Jul 4, 2024
@llvmbot llvmbot added the clang Clang issues not falling into any other category label Jul 4, 2024
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Jul 4, 2024

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: Vlad Serebrennikov (Endilll)

Changes

This patch implements (not yet published) P3144R2 "Deleting a Pointer to an Incomplete Type Should be Ill-formed". Wording changes (not yet merged into the working draft) read:
> 7.6.2.9 [expr.delete] Delete
> If the object being deleted has incomplete class type at the point of deletion <del>and the complete class has a
non-trivial destructor or a deallocation function, the behavior is undefined</del>, <ins>the program is ill-formed</ins>.

We preserve status quo of emitting a warning when deleting a pointer to incomplete type up to, and including, C++23, but make it ill-formed since C++26. Same goes for deleting pointers to void, which has been allowed as an extension.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97733.diff

4 Files Affected:

  • (modified) clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td (+2)
  • (modified) clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp (+9-3)
  • (modified) clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg5xx.cpp (+13-9)
  • (modified) clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp (+17-9)
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td b/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
index 3df64b2ecef1b..5c3e311ac6382 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
+++ b/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
@@ -7991,6 +7991,8 @@ def err_ambiguous_delete_operand : Error<
 def warn_delete_incomplete : Warning<
   "deleting pointer to incomplete type %0 may cause undefined behavior">,
   InGroup<DeleteIncomplete>;
+def err_delete_incomplete : Error<
+  "cannot delete pointer to incomplete type %0">;
 def err_delete_incomplete_class_type : Error<
   "deleting incomplete class type %0; no conversions to pointer type">;
 def err_delete_explicit_conversion : Error<
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
index 69074f92a0286..fcf2189a308a8 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
@@ -3719,8 +3719,11 @@ Sema::ActOnCXXDelete(SourceLocation StartLoc, bool UseGlobal,
       // The C++ standard bans deleting a pointer to a non-object type, which
       // effectively bans deletion of "void*". However, most compilers support
       // this, so we treat it as a warning unless we're in a SFINAE context.
-      Diag(StartLoc, diag::ext_delete_void_ptr_operand)
-        << Type << Ex.get()->getSourceRange();
+      // But we still prohibit this since C++26.
+      Diag(StartLoc, LangOpts.CPlusPlus26 ? diag::err_delete_incomplete
+                                          : diag::ext_delete_void_ptr_operand)
+          << (LangOpts.CPlusPlus26 ? Pointee : Type)
+          << Ex.get()->getSourceRange();
     } else if (Pointee->isFunctionType() || Pointee->isVoidType() ||
                Pointee->isSizelessType()) {
       return ExprError(Diag(StartLoc, diag::err_delete_operand)
@@ -3729,7 +3732,10 @@ Sema::ActOnCXXDelete(SourceLocation StartLoc, bool UseGlobal,
       // FIXME: This can result in errors if the definition was imported from a
       // module but is hidden.
       if (!RequireCompleteType(StartLoc, Pointee,
-                               diag::warn_delete_incomplete, Ex.get())) {
+                               LangOpts.CPlusPlus26
+                                   ? diag::err_delete_incomplete
+                                   : diag::warn_delete_incomplete,
+                               Ex.get())) {
         if (const RecordType *RT = PointeeElem->getAs<RecordType>())
           PointeeRD = cast<CXXRecordDecl>(RT->getDecl());
       }
diff --git a/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg5xx.cpp b/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg5xx.cpp
index 9d890f981348a..6a0bb7a196669 100644
--- a/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg5xx.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg5xx.cpp
@@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++98 %s -verify=expected,cxx98-11,cxx98-14,cxx98-17,cxx98 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 %s -verify=expected,cxx98-11,cxx98-14,cxx98-17,since-cxx11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++14 %s -verify=expected,cxx98-14,cxx98-17,since-cxx11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++17 %s -verify=expected,since-cxx17,cxx98-17,since-cxx11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %s -verify=expected,since-cxx20,since-cxx17,since-cxx11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 %s -verify=expected,since-cxx23,since-cxx20,since-cxx17,since-cxx11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++98 %s -verify=expected,cxx98-23,cxx98-11,cxx98-14,cxx98-17,cxx98 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 %s -verify=expected,cxx98-23,cxx98-11,cxx98-14,cxx98-17,since-cxx11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++14 %s -verify=expected,cxx98-23,cxx98-14,cxx98-17,since-cxx11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++17 %s -verify=expected,cxx98-23,since-cxx17,cxx98-17,since-cxx11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %s -verify=expected,cxx98-23,since-cxx20,since-cxx17,since-cxx11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 %s -verify=expected,cxx98-23,since-cxx23,since-cxx20,since-cxx17,since-cxx11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++2c %s -verify=expected,since-cxx26,since-cxx23,since-cxx20,since-cxx17,since-cxx11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
 
 #if __cplusplus == 199711L
 #define static_assert(...) __extension__ _Static_assert(__VA_ARGS__)
@@ -901,7 +902,8 @@ namespace cwg573 { // cwg573: no
   void *d = reinterpret_cast<void*>(c);
   // cxx98-error@-1 {{cast between pointer-to-function and pointer-to-object is an extension}}
   void f() { delete a; }
-  // expected-error@-1 {{cannot delete expression with pointer-to-'void' type 'void *'}}
+  // cxx98-23-error@-1 {{cannot delete expression with pointer-to-'void' type 'void *'}}
+  // since-cxx26-error@-2 {{cannot delete pointer to incomplete type 'void'}}
   int n = d - a;
   // expected-error@-1 {{arithmetic on pointers to void}}
   // FIXME: This is ill-formed.
@@ -1238,11 +1240,13 @@ namespace cwg599 { // cwg599: partial
   struct V { operator int*(); operator Fn*(); };
   void f(void *p, void (*q)(), S s, T t, U u, V v) {
     delete p;
-    // expected-error@-1 {{cannot delete expression with pointer-to-'void' type 'void *'}}
+    // cxx98-23-error@-1 {{cannot delete expression with pointer-to-'void' type 'void *'}}
+    // since-cxx26-error@-2 {{cannot delete pointer to incomplete type 'void'}}
     delete q;
     // expected-error@-1 {{cannot delete expression of type 'void (*)()'}}
     delete s;
-    // expected-error@-1 {{cannot delete expression with pointer-to-'void' type 'void *'}}
+    // cxx98-23-error@-1 {{cannot delete expression with pointer-to-'void' type 'void *'}}
+    // since-cxx26-error@-2 {{cannot delete pointer to incomplete type 'void'}}
     delete t;
     // expected-error@-1 {{cannot delete expression of type 'T'}}
     // FIXME: This is valid, but is rejected due to a non-conforming GNU
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp
index 1a99c6aac604f..ec6ad43476f94 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp
@@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,precxx20 %s -triple=i686-pc-linux-gnu -Wno-new-returns-null -std=c++98
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,precxx20 %s -triple=i686-pc-linux-gnu -Wno-new-returns-null -std=c++11
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,precxx20 %s -triple=i686-pc-linux-gnu -Wno-new-returns-null -std=c++14
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,cxx17,precxx20 %s -triple=i686-pc-linux-gnu -Wno-new-returns-null -std=c++17
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,cxx17,cxx20 %s -triple=i686-pc-linux-gnu -Wno-new-returns-null -std=c++20
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,cxx98-23,precxx20 %s -triple=i686-pc-linux-gnu -Wno-new-returns-null -std=c++98
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,cxx98-23,precxx20 %s -triple=i686-pc-linux-gnu -Wno-new-returns-null -std=c++11
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,cxx98-23,precxx20 %s -triple=i686-pc-linux-gnu -Wno-new-returns-null -std=c++14
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,cxx98-23,cxx17,precxx20 %s -triple=i686-pc-linux-gnu -Wno-new-returns-null -std=c++17
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,cxx98-23,cxx17,cxx20 %s -triple=i686-pc-linux-gnu -Wno-new-returns-null -std=c++20
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,cxx98-23,cxx17,cxx20 %s -triple=i686-pc-linux-gnu -Wno-new-returns-null -std=c++23
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,since-cxx26,cxx17,cxx20 %s -triple=i686-pc-linux-gnu -Wno-new-returns-null -std=c++2c
 
 // FIXME Location is (frontend)
 // cxx17-note@*:* {{candidate function not viable: requires 2 arguments, but 3 were provided}}
@@ -172,8 +174,12 @@ void bad_deletes()
 {
   delete 0; // expected-error {{cannot delete expression of type 'int'}}
   delete [0] (int*)0; // expected-error {{expected variable name or 'this' in lambda capture list}}
-  delete (void*)0; // expected-warning {{cannot delete expression with pointer-to-'void' type 'void *'}}
-  delete (T*)0; // expected-warning {{deleting pointer to incomplete type}}
+  delete (void*)0;
+  // cxx98-23-warning@-1 {{cannot delete expression with pointer-to-'void' type 'void *'}}
+  // since-cxx26-error@-2 {{cannot delete pointer to incomplete type 'void'}}
+  delete (T*)0;
+  // cxx98-23-warning@-1 {{deleting pointer to incomplete type}}
+  // since-cxx26-error@-2 {{cannot delete pointer to incomplete type 'T'}}
   ::S::delete (int*)0; // expected-error {{expected unqualified-id}}
 }
 
@@ -513,8 +519,10 @@ namespace DeleteIncompleteClass {
 
 namespace DeleteIncompleteClassPointerError {
   struct A; // expected-note {{forward declaration}}
-  void f(A *x) { 1+delete x; } // expected-warning {{deleting pointer to incomplete type}} \
-                               // expected-error {{invalid operands to binary expression}}
+  void f(A *x) { 1+delete x; }
+  // expected-error@-1 {{invalid operands to binary expression}}
+  // cxx98-23-warning@-2 {{deleting pointer to incomplete type}}
+  // since-cxx26-error@-3 {{cannot delete pointer to incomplete type 'A'}}
 }
 
 namespace PR10504 {

Copy link
Member

@Sirraide Sirraide left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, generally speaking, but do we maybe want change the old diagnostic to mention that it’s ‘incompatible w/ C++26’ or however we usually phrase that?

@Sirraide
Copy link
Member

Sirraide commented Jul 4, 2024

Oh also, this still needs a release note and an entry in the C++ support docs, doesn’t it?

@Endilll
Copy link
Contributor Author

Endilll commented Jul 5, 2024

LGTM, generally speaking, but do we maybe want change the old diagnostic to mention that it’s ‘incompatible w/ C++26’ or however we usually phrase that?

Done.

Oh also, this still needs a release note and an entry in the C++ support docs, doesn’t it?

Done.

I also added -Wc++2c-compat flag and a corresponding diagnostic group.

@cor3ntin
Copy link
Contributor

cor3ntin commented Jul 5, 2024

Still missing a change to cxx_status.html

Copy link
Contributor

@cor3ntin cor3ntin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks

@llvmbot llvmbot added the clang:openmp OpenMP related changes to Clang label Jul 5, 2024
@Endilll Endilll merged commit 788731c into llvm:main Jul 5, 2024
9 checks passed
@Endilll Endilll deleted the p3144-delete-incomplete branch July 5, 2024 18:27
kbluck pushed a commit to kbluck/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2024
…." (llvm#97733)

This patch implements (not yet published)
[P3144R2](https://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21stlouis2024/StrawPolls/p3144r2.pdf)
"Deleting a Pointer to an Incomplete Type Should be Ill-formed". Wording
changes (not yet merged into the working draft) read:
> 7.6.2.9 [expr.delete] Delete
> If the object being deleted has incomplete class type at the point of
deletion <del>and the complete class has a
non-trivial destructor or a deallocation function, the behavior is
undefined</del>, <ins>the program is ill-formed</ins>.

We preserve status quo of emitting a warning when deleting a pointer to
incomplete type up to, and including, C++23, but make it ill-formed
since C++26. Same goes for deleting pointers to `void`, which has been
allowed as an extension.
cor3ntin added a commit to cor3ntin/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2024
The changes introduced in llvm#97733 accidentally prevented
to delete an incomplete enum (the validity of which
has been confirmed by CWG2925

Fixes llvm#99278
cor3ntin added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2024
The changes introduced in #97733 accidentally prevented to delete an
incomplete enum (the validity of which has been confirmed by CWG2925

Fixes #99278
cor3ntin added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2024
The changes introduced in #97733 accidentally prevented to delete an
incomplete enum
(the validity of which has been confirmed by CWG2925
    
Fixes #99278
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c++26 clang:frontend Language frontend issues, e.g. anything involving "Sema" clang:openmp OpenMP related changes to Clang clang Clang issues not falling into any other category
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants