-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[clang] Implement P3144R2 "Deleting a Pointer to an Incomplete Type..." #97733
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…hould be Ill-formed"
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Vlad Serebrennikov (Endilll) ChangesThis patch implements (not yet published) P3144R2 "Deleting a Pointer to an Incomplete Type Should be Ill-formed". Wording changes (not yet merged into the working draft) read: We preserve status quo of emitting a warning when deleting a pointer to incomplete type up to, and including, C++23, but make it ill-formed since C++26. Same goes for deleting pointers to Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97733.diff 4 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td b/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
index 3df64b2ecef1b..5c3e311ac6382 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
+++ b/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
@@ -7991,6 +7991,8 @@ def err_ambiguous_delete_operand : Error<
def warn_delete_incomplete : Warning<
"deleting pointer to incomplete type %0 may cause undefined behavior">,
InGroup<DeleteIncomplete>;
+def err_delete_incomplete : Error<
+ "cannot delete pointer to incomplete type %0">;
def err_delete_incomplete_class_type : Error<
"deleting incomplete class type %0; no conversions to pointer type">;
def err_delete_explicit_conversion : Error<
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
index 69074f92a0286..fcf2189a308a8 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
@@ -3719,8 +3719,11 @@ Sema::ActOnCXXDelete(SourceLocation StartLoc, bool UseGlobal,
// The C++ standard bans deleting a pointer to a non-object type, which
// effectively bans deletion of "void*". However, most compilers support
// this, so we treat it as a warning unless we're in a SFINAE context.
- Diag(StartLoc, diag::ext_delete_void_ptr_operand)
- << Type << Ex.get()->getSourceRange();
+ // But we still prohibit this since C++26.
+ Diag(StartLoc, LangOpts.CPlusPlus26 ? diag::err_delete_incomplete
+ : diag::ext_delete_void_ptr_operand)
+ << (LangOpts.CPlusPlus26 ? Pointee : Type)
+ << Ex.get()->getSourceRange();
} else if (Pointee->isFunctionType() || Pointee->isVoidType() ||
Pointee->isSizelessType()) {
return ExprError(Diag(StartLoc, diag::err_delete_operand)
@@ -3729,7 +3732,10 @@ Sema::ActOnCXXDelete(SourceLocation StartLoc, bool UseGlobal,
// FIXME: This can result in errors if the definition was imported from a
// module but is hidden.
if (!RequireCompleteType(StartLoc, Pointee,
- diag::warn_delete_incomplete, Ex.get())) {
+ LangOpts.CPlusPlus26
+ ? diag::err_delete_incomplete
+ : diag::warn_delete_incomplete,
+ Ex.get())) {
if (const RecordType *RT = PointeeElem->getAs<RecordType>())
PointeeRD = cast<CXXRecordDecl>(RT->getDecl());
}
diff --git a/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg5xx.cpp b/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg5xx.cpp
index 9d890f981348a..6a0bb7a196669 100644
--- a/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg5xx.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg5xx.cpp
@@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++98 %s -verify=expected,cxx98-11,cxx98-14,cxx98-17,cxx98 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 %s -verify=expected,cxx98-11,cxx98-14,cxx98-17,since-cxx11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++14 %s -verify=expected,cxx98-14,cxx98-17,since-cxx11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++17 %s -verify=expected,since-cxx17,cxx98-17,since-cxx11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %s -verify=expected,since-cxx20,since-cxx17,since-cxx11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 %s -verify=expected,since-cxx23,since-cxx20,since-cxx17,since-cxx11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++98 %s -verify=expected,cxx98-23,cxx98-11,cxx98-14,cxx98-17,cxx98 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 %s -verify=expected,cxx98-23,cxx98-11,cxx98-14,cxx98-17,since-cxx11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++14 %s -verify=expected,cxx98-23,cxx98-14,cxx98-17,since-cxx11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++17 %s -verify=expected,cxx98-23,since-cxx17,cxx98-17,since-cxx11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %s -verify=expected,cxx98-23,since-cxx20,since-cxx17,since-cxx11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 %s -verify=expected,cxx98-23,since-cxx23,since-cxx20,since-cxx17,since-cxx11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++2c %s -verify=expected,since-cxx26,since-cxx23,since-cxx20,since-cxx17,since-cxx11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
#if __cplusplus == 199711L
#define static_assert(...) __extension__ _Static_assert(__VA_ARGS__)
@@ -901,7 +902,8 @@ namespace cwg573 { // cwg573: no
void *d = reinterpret_cast<void*>(c);
// cxx98-error@-1 {{cast between pointer-to-function and pointer-to-object is an extension}}
void f() { delete a; }
- // expected-error@-1 {{cannot delete expression with pointer-to-'void' type 'void *'}}
+ // cxx98-23-error@-1 {{cannot delete expression with pointer-to-'void' type 'void *'}}
+ // since-cxx26-error@-2 {{cannot delete pointer to incomplete type 'void'}}
int n = d - a;
// expected-error@-1 {{arithmetic on pointers to void}}
// FIXME: This is ill-formed.
@@ -1238,11 +1240,13 @@ namespace cwg599 { // cwg599: partial
struct V { operator int*(); operator Fn*(); };
void f(void *p, void (*q)(), S s, T t, U u, V v) {
delete p;
- // expected-error@-1 {{cannot delete expression with pointer-to-'void' type 'void *'}}
+ // cxx98-23-error@-1 {{cannot delete expression with pointer-to-'void' type 'void *'}}
+ // since-cxx26-error@-2 {{cannot delete pointer to incomplete type 'void'}}
delete q;
// expected-error@-1 {{cannot delete expression of type 'void (*)()'}}
delete s;
- // expected-error@-1 {{cannot delete expression with pointer-to-'void' type 'void *'}}
+ // cxx98-23-error@-1 {{cannot delete expression with pointer-to-'void' type 'void *'}}
+ // since-cxx26-error@-2 {{cannot delete pointer to incomplete type 'void'}}
delete t;
// expected-error@-1 {{cannot delete expression of type 'T'}}
// FIXME: This is valid, but is rejected due to a non-conforming GNU
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp
index 1a99c6aac604f..ec6ad43476f94 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp
@@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,precxx20 %s -triple=i686-pc-linux-gnu -Wno-new-returns-null -std=c++98
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,precxx20 %s -triple=i686-pc-linux-gnu -Wno-new-returns-null -std=c++11
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,precxx20 %s -triple=i686-pc-linux-gnu -Wno-new-returns-null -std=c++14
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,cxx17,precxx20 %s -triple=i686-pc-linux-gnu -Wno-new-returns-null -std=c++17
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,cxx17,cxx20 %s -triple=i686-pc-linux-gnu -Wno-new-returns-null -std=c++20
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,cxx98-23,precxx20 %s -triple=i686-pc-linux-gnu -Wno-new-returns-null -std=c++98
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,cxx98-23,precxx20 %s -triple=i686-pc-linux-gnu -Wno-new-returns-null -std=c++11
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,cxx98-23,precxx20 %s -triple=i686-pc-linux-gnu -Wno-new-returns-null -std=c++14
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,cxx98-23,cxx17,precxx20 %s -triple=i686-pc-linux-gnu -Wno-new-returns-null -std=c++17
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,cxx98-23,cxx17,cxx20 %s -triple=i686-pc-linux-gnu -Wno-new-returns-null -std=c++20
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,cxx98-23,cxx17,cxx20 %s -triple=i686-pc-linux-gnu -Wno-new-returns-null -std=c++23
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,since-cxx26,cxx17,cxx20 %s -triple=i686-pc-linux-gnu -Wno-new-returns-null -std=c++2c
// FIXME Location is (frontend)
// cxx17-note@*:* {{candidate function not viable: requires 2 arguments, but 3 were provided}}
@@ -172,8 +174,12 @@ void bad_deletes()
{
delete 0; // expected-error {{cannot delete expression of type 'int'}}
delete [0] (int*)0; // expected-error {{expected variable name or 'this' in lambda capture list}}
- delete (void*)0; // expected-warning {{cannot delete expression with pointer-to-'void' type 'void *'}}
- delete (T*)0; // expected-warning {{deleting pointer to incomplete type}}
+ delete (void*)0;
+ // cxx98-23-warning@-1 {{cannot delete expression with pointer-to-'void' type 'void *'}}
+ // since-cxx26-error@-2 {{cannot delete pointer to incomplete type 'void'}}
+ delete (T*)0;
+ // cxx98-23-warning@-1 {{deleting pointer to incomplete type}}
+ // since-cxx26-error@-2 {{cannot delete pointer to incomplete type 'T'}}
::S::delete (int*)0; // expected-error {{expected unqualified-id}}
}
@@ -513,8 +519,10 @@ namespace DeleteIncompleteClass {
namespace DeleteIncompleteClassPointerError {
struct A; // expected-note {{forward declaration}}
- void f(A *x) { 1+delete x; } // expected-warning {{deleting pointer to incomplete type}} \
- // expected-error {{invalid operands to binary expression}}
+ void f(A *x) { 1+delete x; }
+ // expected-error@-1 {{invalid operands to binary expression}}
+ // cxx98-23-warning@-2 {{deleting pointer to incomplete type}}
+ // since-cxx26-error@-3 {{cannot delete pointer to incomplete type 'A'}}
}
namespace PR10504 {
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, generally speaking, but do we maybe want change the old diagnostic to mention that it’s ‘incompatible w/ C++26’ or however we usually phrase that?
Oh also, this still needs a release note and an entry in the C++ support docs, doesn’t it? |
Done.
Done. I also added |
Still missing a change to cxx_status.html |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks
…." (llvm#97733) This patch implements (not yet published) [P3144R2](https://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21stlouis2024/StrawPolls/p3144r2.pdf) "Deleting a Pointer to an Incomplete Type Should be Ill-formed". Wording changes (not yet merged into the working draft) read: > 7.6.2.9 [expr.delete] Delete > If the object being deleted has incomplete class type at the point of deletion <del>and the complete class has a non-trivial destructor or a deallocation function, the behavior is undefined</del>, <ins>the program is ill-formed</ins>. We preserve status quo of emitting a warning when deleting a pointer to incomplete type up to, and including, C++23, but make it ill-formed since C++26. Same goes for deleting pointers to `void`, which has been allowed as an extension.
The changes introduced in llvm#97733 accidentally prevented to delete an incomplete enum (the validity of which has been confirmed by CWG2925 Fixes llvm#99278
This patch implements (not yet published) P3144R2 "Deleting a Pointer to an Incomplete Type Should be Ill-formed". Wording changes (not yet merged into the working draft) read:
We preserve status quo of emitting a warning when deleting a pointer to incomplete type up to, and including, C++23, but make it ill-formed since C++26. Same goes for deleting pointers to
void
, which has been allowed as an extension.