-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[flang][stack-arrays] Extend pass to work on declare ops and within omp regions #98810
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-fir-hlfir Author: Kareem Ergawy (ergawy) Changes…mp regions Extends the stack-arrays pass to support This also extends the pass to collect the analysis results within OpenMP regions. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98810.diff 3 Files Affected:
diff --git a/flang/lib/Optimizer/Transforms/StackArrays.cpp b/flang/lib/Optimizer/Transforms/StackArrays.cpp
index e8fa70ebc39d8..f695a7fa2f8fc 100644
--- a/flang/lib/Optimizer/Transforms/StackArrays.cpp
+++ b/flang/lib/Optimizer/Transforms/StackArrays.cpp
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ mlir::ChangeResult LatticePoint::join(const AbstractDenseLattice &lattice) {
void LatticePoint::print(llvm::raw_ostream &os) const {
for (const auto &[value, state] : stateMap) {
- os << value << ": ";
+ os << "\n * " << value << ": ";
::print(os, state);
}
}
@@ -361,6 +361,13 @@ void AllocationAnalysis::visitOperation(mlir::Operation *op,
} else if (mlir::isa<fir::FreeMemOp>(op)) {
assert(op->getNumOperands() == 1 && "fir.freemem has one operand");
mlir::Value operand = op->getOperand(0);
+
+ // Note: StackArrays is scheduled in the pass pipeline after lowering hlfir
+ // to fir. Therefore, we only need to handle `fir::DeclareOp`s.
+ if (auto declareOp =
+ llvm::dyn_cast_if_present<fir::DeclareOp>(operand.getDefiningOp()))
+ operand = declareOp.getMemref();
+
std::optional<AllocationState> operandState = before.get(operand);
if (operandState && *operandState == AllocationState::Allocated) {
// don't tag things not allocated in this function as freed, so that we
@@ -452,6 +459,9 @@ StackArraysAnalysisWrapper::analyseFunction(mlir::Operation *func) {
};
func->walk([&](mlir::func::ReturnOp child) { joinOperationLattice(child); });
func->walk([&](fir::UnreachableOp child) { joinOperationLattice(child); });
+ func->walk(
+ [&](mlir::omp::TerminatorOp child) { joinOperationLattice(child); });
+
llvm::DenseSet<mlir::Value> freedValues;
point.appendFreedValues(freedValues);
@@ -518,9 +528,18 @@ AllocMemConversion::matchAndRewrite(fir::AllocMemOp allocmem,
// remove freemem operations
llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Operation *> erases;
- for (mlir::Operation *user : allocmem.getOperation()->getUsers())
+ for (mlir::Operation *user : allocmem.getOperation()->getUsers()) {
+ if (auto declareOp = mlir::dyn_cast_if_present<fir::DeclareOp>(user)) {
+ for (mlir::Operation *user : declareOp->getUsers()) {
+ if (mlir::isa<fir::FreeMemOp>(user))
+ erases.push_back(user);
+ }
+ }
+
if (mlir::isa<fir::FreeMemOp>(user))
erases.push_back(user);
+ }
+
// now we are done iterating the users, it is safe to mutate them
for (mlir::Operation *erase : erases)
rewriter.eraseOp(erase);
diff --git a/flang/test/Transforms/stack-arrays-hlfir.f90 b/flang/test/Transforms/stack-arrays-hlfir.f90
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..7393eedc98de6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/flang/test/Transforms/stack-arrays-hlfir.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+! Similar to stack-arrays.f90; i.e. both test the stack-arrays pass for different
+! kinds of supported inputs. This one differs in that it takes the hlfir lowering
+! path in flag rather than the fir one. For example, temp arrays are lowered
+! differently in hlfir vs. fir and the IR that reaches the stack arrays pass looks
+! quite different.
+
+
+! RUN: %flang_fc1 -emit-hlfir -fopenmp %s -o - \
+! RUN: | fir-opt --lower-hlfir-ordered-assignments \
+! RUN: | fir-opt --bufferize-hlfir \
+! RUN: | fir-opt --convert-hlfir-to-fir \
+! RUN: | fir-opt --array-value-copy \
+! RUN: | fir-opt --stack-arrays \
+! RUN: | FileCheck %s
+
+subroutine temp_array
+ implicit none
+ integer (8) :: lV
+ integer (8), dimension (2) :: iaVS
+
+ lV = 202
+
+ iaVS = [lV, lV]
+end subroutine temp_array
+! CHECK-LABEL: func.func @_QPtemp_array{{.*}} {
+! CHECK-NOT: fir.allocmem
+! CHECK-NOT: fir.freemem
+! CHECK: fir.alloca !fir.array<2xi64>
+! CHECK-NOT: fir.allocmem
+! CHECK-NOT: fir.freemem
+! CHECK: return
+! CHECK-NEXT: }
+
+subroutine omp_temp_array
+ implicit none
+ integer (8) :: lV
+ integer (8), dimension (2) :: iaVS
+
+ lV = 202
+
+ !$omp target
+ iaVS = [lV, lV]
+ !$omp end target
+end subroutine omp_temp_array
+! CHECK-LABEL: func.func @_QPomp_temp_array{{.*}} {
+! CHECK: omp.target {{.*}} {
+! CHECK-NOT: fir.allocmem
+! CHECK-NOT: fir.freemem
+! CHECK: fir.alloca !fir.array<2xi64>
+! CHECK-NOT: fir.allocmem
+! CHECK-NOT: fir.freemem
+! CHECK: omp.terminator
+! CHECK-NEXT: }
+! CHECK: return
+! CHECK-NEXT: }
diff --git a/flang/test/Transforms/stack-arrays.fir b/flang/test/Transforms/stack-arrays.fir
index a2ffe555091eb..841fea56c35d1 100644
--- a/flang/test/Transforms/stack-arrays.fir
+++ b/flang/test/Transforms/stack-arrays.fir
@@ -339,13 +339,10 @@ func.func @omp_placement1() {
return
}
// CHECK: func.func @omp_placement1() {
+// CHECK-NEXT: %[[MEM:.*]] = fir.alloca !fir.array<42xi32>
+// CHECK-NEXT: %[[MEM_CONV:.*]] = fir.convert %[[MEM]] : (!fir.ref<!fir.array<42xi32>>) -> !fir.heap<!fir.array<42xi32>>
// CHECK-NEXT: omp.sections {
// CHECK-NEXT: omp.section {
-// CHECK-NEXT: %[[MEM:.*]] = fir.allocmem !fir.array<42xi32>
-// TODO: this allocation should be moved to the stack. Unfortunately, the data
-// flow analysis fails to propogate the lattice out of the omp region to the
-// return satement.
-// CHECK-NEXT: fir.freemem %[[MEM]] : !fir.heap<!fir.array<42xi32>>
// CHECK-NEXT: omp.terminator
// CHECK-NEXT: }
// CHECK-NEXT: omp.terminator
|
|
||
// Note: StackArrays is scheduled in the pass pipeline after lowering hlfir | ||
// to fir. Therefore, we only need to handle `fir::DeclareOp`s. | ||
if (auto declareOp = |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure this a proper use of the DFA framework in this case or not.
In particular, should I instead propagate the information through the fir.declare
op instead of doing this indirect check of the operand? The problem is that this will complicate things a bit more:
- we will either need to mark both the value returned from the
allocmem
and the value returned from thedeclare
op asAllocated
. I don't think this will be correct. - or we will need a new "intermediate"
AllocationState
, for example:AllocDeclare
(?) to mark the results offir.declare
ops. If the current approach in the PR does not fit how the framework should be used, I think this option might be better.
Let me know if you have any thoughts on this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't have the context on the fir
dialect to comment on the memory effects model here, but what I can say is this should be fine. What you want is if the allocation state of the result of declareOp
is modified, that this function gets re-invoked on the right user, which the DFA framework should ensure happens properly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree this is fine and a lot simpler than tracking both references to the allocated
variable
e1684d2
to
62457c3
Compare
…mp regions Extends the stack-arrays pass to support `fir.declare` ops. Before that, we did not recognize malloc-free pairs for which `fir.declare` is used to declare the allocated entity. This is because the `free` op was invoked on the result of the `fir.declare` op and did not directly use the allocated memory SSA value. This also extends the pass to collect the analysis results within OpenMP regions.
62457c3
to
64ee7b3
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems fine to me but I do not have the authority to approve :^)
|
||
// Note: StackArrays is scheduled in the pass pipeline after lowering hlfir | ||
// to fir. Therefore, we only need to handle `fir::DeclareOp`s. | ||
if (auto declareOp = |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't have the context on the fir
dialect to comment on the memory effects model here, but what I can say is this should be fine. What you want is if the allocation state of the result of declareOp
is modified, that this function gets re-invoked on the right user, which the DFA framework should ensure happens properly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks very much for this update! Getting stack arrays working after the HLFIR transition was long overdue.
+1 for the changes for the handling of declare ops.
What you have so far for handling OpenMP regions looks good to me because the pass only runs on functions and so this will not effect outlined reduction and privatisation declarations.
|
||
// Note: StackArrays is scheduled in the pass pipeline after lowering hlfir | ||
// to fir. Therefore, we only need to handle `fir::DeclareOp`s. | ||
if (auto declareOp = |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree this is fine and a lot simpler than tracking both references to the allocated
variable
✅ With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code formatter. |
…mp regions (#98810) Summary: Extends the stack-arrays pass to support `fir.declare` ops. Before that, we did not recognize malloc-free pairs for which `fir.declare` is used to declare the allocated entity. This is because the `free` op was invoked on the result of the `fir.declare` op and did not directly use the allocated memory SSA value. This also extends the pass to collect the analysis results within OpenMP regions. Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: Differential Revision: https://phabricator.intern.facebook.com/D60250941
Extends the stack-arrays pass to support
fir.declare
ops. Before that, we did not recognize malloc-free pairs for whichfir.declare
is used to declare the allocated entity. This is because thefree
op was invoked on the result of thefir.declare
op and did not directly use the allocated memory SSA value.This also extends the pass to collect the analysis results within OpenMP regions.