Skip to content

[UnifyLoopExits] Never generate phis of only undef values #99924

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 23, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
11 changes: 9 additions & 2 deletions llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1909,22 +1909,29 @@ static void reconnectPhis(BasicBlock *Out, BasicBlock *GuardBlock,
auto NewPhi =
PHINode::Create(Phi->getType(), Incoming.size(),
Phi->getName() + ".moved", FirstGuardBlock->begin());
bool AllUndef = true;
for (auto *In : Incoming) {
Value *V = UndefValue::get(Phi->getType());
if (In == Out) {
V = NewPhi;
} else if (Phi->getBasicBlockIndex(In) != -1) {
V = Phi->removeIncomingValue(In, false);
AllUndef &= isa<UndefValue>(V);
}
NewPhi->addIncoming(V, In);
}
assert(NewPhi->getNumIncomingValues() == Incoming.size());
Value *NewV = NewPhi;
if (AllUndef) {
NewPhi->eraseFromParent();
NewV = UndefValue::get(Phi->getType());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this try to preserve poison?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As of right now, this emits undef by default. We likely want to change both UndefValue::get to poison. Should I include that and track undef/poison separately?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It probably makes little difference, can switch these to poison as a second step?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, let's do this first, then we switch to poison.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't really understand. Are we agreeing that it's okay to temporarily ignore UndefValue that are actually poison in this patch?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All poisons are undef. Not all undefs are poison. It's safe, though suboptimal, to replace poison with undef

}
if (Phi->getNumOperands() == 0) {
Phi->replaceAllUsesWith(NewPhi);
Phi->replaceAllUsesWith(NewV);
I = Phi->eraseFromParent();
continue;
}
Phi->addIncoming(NewPhi, GuardBlock);
Phi->addIncoming(NewV, GuardBlock);
++I;
}
}
Expand Down
58 changes: 58 additions & 0 deletions llvm/test/Transforms/UnifyLoopExits/undef-phis.ll
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5
; RUN: opt < %s -passes='unify-loop-exits' -S | FileCheck %s

define fastcc void @undef_phi(i64 %i5247, i1 %i4530, i1 %i4936.not) {
; CHECK-LABEL: define fastcc void @undef_phi(
; CHECK-SAME: i64 [[I5247:%.*]], i1 [[I4530:%.*]], i1 [[I4936_NOT:%.*]]) {
; CHECK-NEXT: [[BB:.*:]]
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[MBB3932:.*]]
; CHECK: [[MBB3932]]:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[MBB4454:.*]]
; CHECK: [[MBB4321:.*]]:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP0:%.*]] = trunc i64 [[I5247]] to i32
; CHECK-NEXT: [[I5290:%.*]] = icmp eq i32 [[TMP0]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[I5290]], label %[[MBB3932]], label %[[LOOP_EXIT_GUARD:.*]]
; CHECK: [[MBB4454]]:
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[I4530]], label %[[MBB4535:.*]], label %[[LOOP_EXIT_GUARD1:.*]]
; CHECK: [[MBB4531:.*]]:
; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
; CHECK: [[MBB4535]]:
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[I4936_NOT]], label %[[LOOP_EXIT_GUARD1]], label %[[MBB4454]]
; CHECK: [[MBB5291:.*]]:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[I5293:%.*]] = insertvalue [2 x i32] zeroinitializer, i32 [[DOTMOVED:%.*]], 1
; CHECK-NEXT: store volatile [2 x i32] [[I5293]], ptr addrspace(5) null, align 4
; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
; CHECK: [[LOOP_EXIT_GUARD]]:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[DOTMOVED]] = phi i32 [ [[TMP0]], %[[MBB4321]] ], [ undef, %[[LOOP_EXIT_GUARD1]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[GUARD_MBB4531:%.*]] = phi i1 [ false, %[[MBB4321]] ], [ [[GUARD_MBB4531_MOVED:%.*]], %[[LOOP_EXIT_GUARD1]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[GUARD_MBB4531]], label %[[MBB4531]], label %[[MBB5291]]
; CHECK: [[LOOP_EXIT_GUARD1]]:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[GUARD_MBB4531_MOVED]] = phi i1 [ true, %[[MBB4454]] ], [ undef, %[[MBB4535]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[GUARD_LOOP_EXIT_GUARD:%.*]] = phi i1 [ true, %[[MBB4454]] ], [ false, %[[MBB4535]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[GUARD_LOOP_EXIT_GUARD]], label %[[LOOP_EXIT_GUARD]], label %[[MBB4321]]
;
mbb:
br label %mbb3932

mbb3932: ; preds = %mbb4321, %mbb
br label %mbb4454

mbb4321: ; preds = %mbb4535
%0 = trunc i64 %i5247 to i32
%i5290 = icmp eq i32 %0, 0
br i1 %i5290, label %mbb3932, label %mbb5291

mbb4454: ; preds = %mbb4535, %mbb3932
br i1 %i4530, label %mbb4535, label %mbb4531

mbb4531: ; preds = %mbb4454
ret void

mbb4535: ; preds = %mbb4454
br i1 %i4936.not, label %mbb4321, label %mbb4454

mbb5291: ; preds = %mbb4321
%i5293 = insertvalue [2 x i32] zeroinitializer, i32 %0, 1
store volatile [2 x i32] %i5293, ptr addrspace(5) null, align 4
ret void
}
Loading