Refer to p for what it is (a Kernel method not a keyword)
#313
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
For the sake of correctness :) Side discussion: This also means that it _is_ possible to override the p function and have it function as a paragraph function. Whether or not to do it is a discussion that should probably be had in a different issue. It's the question if taking away the beloved p from debugging inside their component (making it available as `_p` or what not) is a reasonable exchange for having a more direct mapping to the HTML `<p>` tag and that people don't have to keep that one exception mind.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For the sake of correctness :)
Side discussion: This also means that it is possible to
override the p function and have it function as a paragraph
function.
Whether or not to do it is a discussion that should probably
be had in a different issue.
It's the question if taking away the beloved p from debugging
inside their component (making it available as
_por what not)is a reasonable exchange for having a more direct mapping to the
HTML
<p>tag and that people don't have to keep that oneexception mind.