Skip to content

GitHub bot should ignore epics when assigning data science issues #14286

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 9, 2020
Merged

GitHub bot should ignore epics when assigning data science issues #14286

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 9, 2020

Conversation

joyceerhl
Copy link

Noticed that https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-python/issues/14208 got auto assigned to Don

  • Pull request represents a single change (i.e. not fixing disparate/unrelated things in a single PR).
  • Title summarizes what is changing.
  • Has a news entry file (remember to thank yourself!).
  • Appropriate comments and documentation strings in the code.
  • Has sufficient logging.
  • Has telemetry for enhancements.
  • Unit tests & system/integration tests are added/updated.
  • Test plan is updated as appropriate.
  • package-lock.json has been regenerated by running npm install (if dependencies have changed).
  • The wiki is updated with any design decisions/details.

@joyceerhl joyceerhl added the no-changelog No news entry required label Oct 6, 2020
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (main@7049770). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is 64.31%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #14286   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   59.91%           
=======================================
  Files           ?      709           
  Lines           ?    39334           
  Branches        ?     5698           
=======================================
  Hits            ?    23566           
  Misses          ?    14530           
  Partials        ?     1238           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/client/activation/common/activatorBase.ts 14.41% <0.00%> (ø)
...rc/client/activation/jedi/multiplexingActivator.ts 17.74% <0.00%> (ø)
src/client/activation/node/languageServerProxy.ts 26.58% <0.00%> (ø)
src/client/activation/refCountedLanguageServer.ts 41.30% <0.00%> (ø)
src/client/activation/types.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/client/common/process/pythonDaemon.ts 14.28% <0.00%> (ø)
src/client/common/utils/localize.ts 96.24% <ø> (ø)
src/client/datascience/baseJupyterSession.ts 57.33% <ø> (ø)
.../datascience/interactive-common/interactiveBase.ts 5.78% <0.00%> (ø)
...ient/datascience/interactive-ipynb/nativeEditor.ts 7.78% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 57 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7049770...ceef2b5. Read the comment docs.

@joyceerhl joyceerhl closed this Oct 8, 2020
@joyceerhl joyceerhl reopened this Oct 8, 2020
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Oct 8, 2020

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities (and Security Hotspot 0 Security Hotspots to review)
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
no-changelog No news entry required
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants