Skip to content

chore: add type-powered eslint rules #62

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 11, 2025
Merged

chore: add type-powered eslint rules #62

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 11, 2025

Conversation

gagik
Copy link
Collaborator

@gagik gagik commented Apr 11, 2025

We haven't been utilizing typescript-eslint's features to the fullest so adds some extra configuration to enable them and benefit from stricter types. It's already letting us see some not well defined behavior issues so that's good.

@gagik gagik requested a review from nirinchev April 11, 2025 12:12
"build:chmod": "chmod +x dist/index.js",
"build": "npm run build:clean && npm run build:compile && npm run build:addshebang && npm run build:chmod",
"build": "npm run build:clean && npm run build:compile && npm run build:chmod",
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if you're removing shebang you should also remove chmod, that was meant to help before npm package is sorted

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@gagik gagik Apr 11, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@gagik gagik merged commit 3f1dece into main Apr 11, 2025
4 checks passed
@gagik gagik deleted the gagik/strict-eslint branch April 11, 2025 14:08
nirinchev added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2025
* main:
  chore: auto generate apiClient (#64)
  refactor: rename state to session, combine tool registration, and clearer dependencies (#55)
  chore: add type-powered eslint rules (#62)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants