Skip to content

DOCS-7339: Sharding Reorganization #2657

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ravindk89
Copy link
Contributor

@ravindk89 ravindk89 commented Jun 24, 2016

This change is Reviewable

@ravindk89 ravindk89 force-pushed the DOCS-7339 branch 2 times, most recently from 4950aa5 to 5e6b21d Compare June 24, 2016 19:19
Stage 1: Moved pages around, nuked old toc files

Stage 2: Integrated feedback, major re-writes of content pages

Stage 3: Reorg'd the Reorg, added redirects, orphaned stuff
@kay-kim
Copy link
Contributor

kay-kim commented Jun 30, 2016

merged!

@kay-kim kay-kim closed this Jun 30, 2016
@schmalliso
Copy link
Contributor

Have you put in redirects for these?

  • added: source/administration/sharded-cluster-administration.txt
  • added: source/administration/sharded-cluster-config-servers.txt
  • removed: source/administration/sharded-cluster-maintenance.txt
  • added: source/core/hashed-sharding.txt
  • added: source/core/ranged-sharding.txt
  • added: source/core/sharding-balancer-administration.txt
  • added: source/core/sharding-data-partitioning.txt
  • added: source/core/sharding-deployment.txt
  • added: source/tutorial/deploy-sharded-cluster-hashed-sharding.txt
  • added: source/tutorial/deploy-sharded-cluster-ranged-sharding.txt

mongo-cr-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2023
… validation fails (#2631) (#2657)

* DOCS-15860 full validation does not report index info when collection validation fails

* external review
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants