Skip to content

feat!(NODE-4461): remove Decimal128 toObject transformer #526

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 30, 2022

Conversation

nbbeeken
Copy link
Contributor

@nbbeeken nbbeeken commented Nov 22, 2022

Description

What is changing?

Remove toObject transformer for d128

What is the motivation for this change?

Difficult maintenance, and unexpected results from serializer when defined (toObject's return type isn't constrained)

Double check the following

  • Ran npm run lint script
  • Self-review completed using the steps outlined here
  • PR title follows the correct format: <type>(NODE-xxxx)<!>: <description>
  • Changes are covered by tests
  • New TODOs have a related JIRA ticket

addaleax
addaleax previously approved these changes Nov 23, 2022
@nbbeeken nbbeeken force-pushed the NODE-4461-rm-toObject-d128 branch from 991fc9d to 572a5f9 Compare November 23, 2022 20:56
@nbbeeken nbbeeken marked this pull request as ready for review November 23, 2022 20:56
@nbbeeken nbbeeken force-pushed the NODE-4461-rm-toObject-d128 branch from 572a5f9 to 563e539 Compare November 28, 2022 20:31
@dariakp dariakp added the Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes label Nov 29, 2022
@dariakp dariakp added Team Review Needs review from team and removed Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes labels Nov 30, 2022
@dariakp dariakp merged commit 14a7473 into main Nov 30, 2022
@dariakp dariakp deleted the NODE-4461-rm-toObject-d128 branch November 30, 2022 20:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Team Review Needs review from team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants