Skip to content

CXX-3174 Revert include-guard-conditioned macro guards in mongocxx #1262

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 11, 2024

Conversation

eramongodb
Copy link
Contributor

@eramongodb eramongodb commented Nov 8, 2024

Followup to #1202, where use of these "smart macro guards" conditioned on include guard macros was intended to be reverted (see: #1202 (comment)) but neglected to apply the changes to mongocxx headers. Reverting now for consistency. I don't expect this to have caused any issues, but nevertheless, may opt to cherry-pick onto the r3.11 branch if deemed necessary.

@eramongodb eramongodb requested a review from kevinAlbs November 8, 2024 21:42
@eramongodb eramongodb self-assigned this Nov 8, 2024
@eramongodb eramongodb changed the title CXX-3093 Revert include-guard-conditioned macro guard in mongocxx CXX-3174 Revert include-guard-conditioned macro guards in mongocxx Nov 8, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@kevinAlbs kevinAlbs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

may opt to cherry-pick onto the r3.11 branch if deemed necessary.

IMO a cherry-pick seems unnecessary. But would not be opposed if it would ease cherry-picking another related change to r3.11.

@eramongodb
Copy link
Contributor Author

IMO a cherry-pick seems unnecessary.

Will leave as-is then for the r3.11 branch.

@eramongodb eramongodb merged commit 3865adf into mongodb:master Nov 11, 2024
16 of 19 checks passed
@eramongodb eramongodb deleted the cxx-3093 branch November 11, 2024 21:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants