Skip to content

PHPC-2200: Add MongoDB rapid releases to Evergreen matrix #1408

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Apr 11, 2023

Conversation

jmikola
Copy link
Member

@jmikola jmikola commented Apr 5, 2023

@jmikola jmikola requested a review from alcaeus April 5, 2023 06:34
variables:
VERSION: "5.0"
MONGODB_VERSION: "6.0"
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thoughts on using "rapid" here?

See also: mongodb/mongo-php-library#1056 (comment)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

SGTM 👍

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Quoting @JamesKovacs from Slack:

When M.0.0 goes GA, rapid points to (M-1).3.x for a quarter, which isn't useful since no one can run that quarterly release

With that in mind, I think keeping 6.0 makes sense here and we can just bump to 7.0 when that gets released.

display_name: "Load balanced - ${mongodb-versions}"
exclude_spec:
# Load balancer is available from MongoDB 5.0+
- { "os": "debian11", "mongodb-versions": ["3.6", "4.0", "4.2", "4.4"], "php-edge-versions": "latest-stable" }
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The test-csfle-skip_crypt_shared matrix below currently use 6.0 exclusively. Let me know if you think it makes sense to test on 6.0+ using an exclude_spec similar to what we have here.

See also: mongodb/mongo-php-library#1056 (comment)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

SGTM 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants