-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 266
PHPLIB-651: Support $merge and $out executing on secondaries #861
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When I recently spoke to @kevinAlbs about this (re: mongodb/specifications#1062 (comment)), I mentioned an alternative implementation that could bypass a second server selection attempt (i.e.
mongoc_client_select_server
) by instead iterating onManager::getServers()
to select a primary.Thanks to the first server selection attempt, we can be guaranteed that the topology has been discovered.
getServers()
shouldn't return an empty array unless there really are no servers available. But I also don't think there's much benefit to that approach vs. simply invoking server selection a second time. The edge case is that if there really isn't a primary available, we'll block forserverSelectionTimeoutMS
on this second attempt.But if the root concern is potentially blocking the application for
2 * serverSelectionTimeoutMS
, let's consider how that might actually happen:$out
/$merge
pipeline and the topology doesn't have a secondary at all, the default scenario will abort early thanks toserverSelectionTryOnce
and abort the entireaggregate()
method.serverSelectionTryOnce=false
and a loop is permitted, server selection could theoretically discover a secondary just beforeserverSelectionTimeoutMS
expires (e.g. at 29 seconds in) and return that server.serverSelectionTimeoutMS
to ultimately select a primary (e.g. wait through an election) or hit a server selection timeout.That scenario seems quite rare, so I'm inclined to keep the code as-is rather and punt on any optimization until we actually have evidence that this causes problems down the line. IMO, the
aggregate()
helper is already very convoluted so anything we can do to avoid introducing more complexity is welcomed.