-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 199
[ADR-001] bookmark manager #771
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
20326d9
to
b2b6f42
Compare
* respect database reported in summary * fix lock usage * other small fixes
Implement ADR adjustments to bookmark manager neo-technology/drivers-adr#30
`bookmark_consumer` -> `bookmarks_consumer` `bookmark_supplier` -> `bookmarks_supplier` neo-technology/drivers-adr#31
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The changes on the workspace might broke session.last_bookmarks()
current behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Rouven Bauer <[email protected]>
The change was meant to get rid of a deprecation warning. It'll be moved into it's own PR.
* Avoid calling the BMM implementation that's shipped with the driver "default bookmark manger". This could lead users to believe it's enabled by default. * little oversights Signed-off-by: Rouven Bauer <[email protected]>
* Adjust BMM interface: bookmark types are now `Collection`s instead of `Iterable`s. This allows for slightly more efficient BMM implementations without creating significant friction in the usage of BMMs. * Docs typo. Signed-off-by: Rouven Bauer <[email protected]>
Discovered by Antonio
Co-authored-by: Florent Biville <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🔖 🧑💼
Waiting for neo4j-drivers/testkit#509 to be merged. Then re-run CI. |
To do: