Skip to content

[management] Update traffic events pagination filters #3857

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 22, 2025

Conversation

bcmmbaga
Copy link
Contributor

Describe your changes

Issue ticket number and link

Stack

Checklist

  • Is it a bug fix
  • Is a typo/documentation fix
  • Is a feature enhancement
  • It is a refactor
  • Created tests that fail without the change (if possible)
  • Extended the README / documentation, if necessary

@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 21, 2025 19:02
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds pagination filters to traffic events by introducing a new filter for "reporter_id" and updating search filter comments for clarity.

  • Added a ReporterId filter to the API parameters.
  • Updated search filter descriptions in both Go types and OpenAPI specification.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File Description
management/server/http/api/types.gen.go Added ReporterId filter and updated Search filter description.
management/server/http/api/openapi.yml Added reporter_id query parameter and clarified Search filter description.

@bcmmbaga bcmmbaga force-pushed the traffic-events-pagination-filters branch from a8ee1b5 to d809701 Compare May 21, 2025 19:06
Copy link

@bcmmbaga bcmmbaga merged commit 24f932b into main May 22, 2025
35 checks passed
@bcmmbaga bcmmbaga deleted the traffic-events-pagination-filters branch May 22, 2025 13:28
Copy link

@Gitroro73 Gitroro73 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

APrivateKey1zkp6pcrZFixYrNrEq3vD8tLyq28fSeZSJqeatuSoVBiRyCS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants