Skip to content

nix::InterfaceAddress: adding interface information if it is UP. #2469

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

devnexen
Copy link
Contributor

@devnexen devnexen commented Aug 9, 2024

No description provided.

@devnexen devnexen marked this pull request as ready for review August 9, 2024 21:26
Copy link
Member

@SteveLauC SteveLauC left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI failures are not related, I will handle them.

Copy link
Member

@SteveLauC SteveLauC left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, perhaps I need a reason for this change even though it is ok and trivial, we already have this info in addr.flags.contains(InterfaceFlags::IFF_UP).

I think we need to consider what should be stored in the struct, currently, all the stored fields come from the libc struct libc::ifaddrs.

@devnexen
Copy link
Contributor Author

well, we can consider extra fields as info access aliases/shortcuts wdyt ?

@SteveLauC
Copy link
Member

we can consider extra fields as info access aliases/shortcut

I am thinking that if getting this info is already straightforward, then there is no need to add a shortcut for it 😶

@SteveLauC
Copy link
Member

CI fixed in #2470

@devnexen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sure, anyway up to you if you want to merge it, no hard feeling if you don't :)

@SteveLauC
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the understanding ❤️, I will close this PR then:)

@SteveLauC SteveLauC closed this Aug 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants