-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
Merge v0.10.x into main #1032
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merge v0.10.x into main #1032
Changes from all commits
0f8b59d
ac9094d
b09b243
b108d7f
3d9f85f
0d0d9b2
7510404
c0331a4
eec0c91
286a6d8
b9fc9e6
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ | ||
Fri Jan 10 2025 Łukasz Stolarczuk <[email protected]> | ||
|
||
* Version 0.10.1 | ||
|
||
This patch release contains: | ||
- Set symbol versions 0.10 in def/map files (#1013) | ||
- Fix: remove incorrect assert in utils_align_ptr_up_size_down() (#977) | ||
- Add strings with UMF version and useful CMake options (#992) | ||
- Extended error messages, when providers are disabled (#1012) | ||
|
||
Mon Dec 09 2024 Łukasz Stolarczuk <[email protected]> | ||
|
||
* Version 0.10.0 | ||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ | |
# Under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. See LICENSE.TXT. | ||
# SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception | ||
|
||
UMF_1.0 { | ||
UMF_0.10 { | ||
global: | ||
umfInit; | ||
umfTearDown; | ||
|
@@ -25,9 +25,6 @@ UMF_1.0 { | |
umfFileMemoryProviderParamsSetPath; | ||
umfFileMemoryProviderParamsSetProtection; | ||
umfFileMemoryProviderParamsSetVisibility; | ||
umfFixedMemoryProviderOps; | ||
umfFixedMemoryProviderParamsCreate; | ||
umfFixedMemoryProviderParamsDestroy; | ||
umfFree; | ||
umfGetIPCHandle; | ||
umfGetLastFailedMemoryProvider; | ||
|
@@ -117,3 +114,9 @@ UMF_1.0 { | |
local: | ||
*; | ||
}; | ||
|
||
UMF_0.11 { | ||
umfFixedMemoryProviderOps; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. do we have any other new symbols on main...? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'm not sure what about recent change in umf_memory_provider_ops_t struct and functions using it but we'll figure it out in backward comp. tests There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. heh, I guess we have to figure it out, cause it's already failing on my test branch in UR 😄 https://github.com/oneapi-src/unified-runtime/actions/runs/12710368809/job/35431309282?pr=2546 There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lukaszstolarczuk Is it still failing ? |
||
umfFixedMemoryProviderParamsCreate; | ||
umfFixedMemoryProviderParamsDestroy; | ||
} UMF_0.10; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. not sure on this one - I based this on info from https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/ld/VERSION.html |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not sure if this one should be updated...?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it should match map file even if this is not used anywhere