Skip to content

Do not print anything if allocation size results in os allocation #393

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 27, 2024
Merged

Do not print anything if allocation size results in os allocation #393

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 27, 2024

Conversation

igchor
Copy link
Member

@igchor igchor commented Mar 26, 2024

this messes up match files in UR. This should only be printed if requested (using logger).

Description

Checklist

  • Code compiles without errors locally
  • All tests pass locally
  • CI workflows execute properly
  • CI workflows, not executed per PR (e.g. Nightly), execute properly
  • New tests added, especially if they will fail without my changes
  • Added/extended example(s) to cover this functionality
  • Extended the README/documentation
  • All newly added source files have a license
  • All newly added source files are referenced in CMake files
  • Logger (with debug/info/... messages) is used

@igchor
Do not print anything if allocation size results in os allocation
687f546 
this messes up match files in UR. This should only be printed if
requested (using logger).
@igchor igchor marked this pull request as ready for review March 27, 2024 00:11
@igchor igchor requested a review from a team as a code owner March 27, 2024 00:11
@bratpiorka bratpiorka requested a review from ldorau March 27, 2024 08:33
@lukaszstolarczuk lukaszstolarczuk merged commit 837f205 into oneapi-src:main Mar 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@bratpiorka bratpiorka bratpiorka approved these changes

@lukaszstolarczuk lukaszstolarczuk lukaszstolarczuk approved these changes

@ldorau ldorau Awaiting requested review from ldorau

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@igchor @bratpiorka @lukaszstolarczuk