Update File provider config API

[vinser52]

Description

Change the File Provider config as we agreed in #844.

Checklist

• Code compiles without errors locally
• All tests pass locally
• CI workflows execute properly
• New tests added, especially if they will fail without my changes

[ldorau]

The code coverage of the src/provider/provider_file_memory.c file on the main branch is 81% while on this PR 78.8% - it could be improved, so that it does not decrease.

[vinser52]

The code coverage of the src/provider/provider_file_memory.c file on the main branch is 81% while on this PR 78.8% - it could be improved, so that it does not decrease.

The main reason for code coverage decrease is because of these lines:

#if defined(_WIN32) || defined(UMF_NO_HWLOC)

umf_memory_provider_ops_t *umfFileMemoryProviderOps(void) {
    // not supported
    return NULL;
}

umf_result_t umfFileMemoryProviderParamsCreate(
    umf_file_memory_provider_params_handle_t *hParams, const char *path) {
    (void)hParams;
    (void)path;
    return UMF_RESULT_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED;
}

umf_result_t umfFileMemoryProviderParamsDestroy(
    umf_file_memory_provider_params_handle_t hParams) {
    (void)hParams;
    return UMF_RESULT_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED;
}

umf_result_t umfFileMemoryProviderParamsSetPath(
    umf_file_memory_provider_params_handle_t hParams, const char *path) {
    (void)hParams;
    (void)path;
    return UMF_RESULT_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED;
}

umf_result_t umfFileMemoryProviderParamsSetProtection(
    umf_file_memory_provider_params_handle_t hParams, unsigned protection) {
    (void)hParams;
    (void)protection;
    return UMF_RESULT_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED;
}

umf_result_t umfFileMemoryProviderParamsSetVisibility(
    umf_file_memory_provider_params_handle_t hParams,
    umf_memory_visibility_t visibility) {
    (void)hParams;
    (void)visibility;
    return UMF_RESULT_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED;
}

#else // !defined(_WIN32) && !defined(UMF_NO_HWLOC)

We have no tests when provider is disabled at build time. And it is true for all providers.

[vinser52]

The code coverage of the src/provider/provider_file_memory.c file on the main branch is 81% while on this PR 78.8% - it could be improved, so that it does not decrease.

The main reason for code coverage decrease is because of these lines:

#if defined(_WIN32) || defined(UMF_NO_HWLOC)

umf_memory_provider_ops_t *umfFileMemoryProviderOps(void) {
    // not supported
    return NULL;
}

umf_result_t umfFileMemoryProviderParamsCreate(
    umf_file_memory_provider_params_handle_t *hParams, const char *path) {
    (void)hParams;
    (void)path;
    return UMF_RESULT_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED;
}

umf_result_t umfFileMemoryProviderParamsDestroy(
    umf_file_memory_provider_params_handle_t hParams) {
    (void)hParams;
    return UMF_RESULT_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED;
}

umf_result_t umfFileMemoryProviderParamsSetPath(
    umf_file_memory_provider_params_handle_t hParams, const char *path) {
    (void)hParams;
    (void)path;
    return UMF_RESULT_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED;
}

umf_result_t umfFileMemoryProviderParamsSetProtection(
    umf_file_memory_provider_params_handle_t hParams, unsigned protection) {
    (void)hParams;
    (void)protection;
    return UMF_RESULT_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED;
}

umf_result_t umfFileMemoryProviderParamsSetVisibility(
    umf_file_memory_provider_params_handle_t hParams,
    umf_memory_visibility_t visibility) {
    (void)hParams;
    (void)visibility;
    return UMF_RESULT_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED;
}

#else // !defined(_WIN32) && !defined(UMF_NO_HWLOC)

We have no tests when provider is disabled at build time. And it is true for all providers.

Ok, I have added corresponding test.

[vinser52]

The new code coverage of the src/provider/provider_file_memory.c file is 81.7%.