Skip to content

Bug 2017327: Block cross-package skips/replaces on add (#826) #216

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ankitathomas
Copy link
Contributor

  • Block cross-package skips/replaces on add
  • bump blang/semver to v4

* Block cross-package skips/replaces on add

Signed-off-by: Ankita Thomas <[email protected]>

* bump blang/semver to v4

Signed-off-by: Ankita Thomas <[email protected]>

Upstream-repository: operator-registry
Upstream-commit 0c3c5ca31a6da4011dd2536e686b37802ac40631
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. label Nov 24, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 24, 2021

@ankitathomas: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2017327, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.10.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 2017327: Block cross-package skips/replaces on add (#826)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Nov 24, 2021
@ankitathomas
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 24, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ankitathomas

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Nov 24, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 24, 2021

@ankitathomas: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2017327, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.10.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.10.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jianzhangbjz

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Nov 24, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from jianzhangbjz November 24, 2021 19:01
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 24, 2021

@ankitathomas: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/verify f1dffda link true /test verify
ci/prow/unit-registry f1dffda link true /test unit-registry
ci/prow/unit-olm f1dffda link true /test unit-olm
ci/prow/e2e-aws-console-olm f1dffda link true /test e2e-aws-console-olm

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@timflannagan
Copy link
Contributor

This is a closing candidate since #218 has since landed.

@ankitathomas
Copy link
Contributor Author

Merged in #218

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 6, 2021

@ankitathomas: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2017327. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. All external bug links have been closed. The bug has been moved to the NEW state.

In response to this:

Bug 2017327: Block cross-package skips/replaces on add (#826)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

awgreene pushed a commit to awgreene/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2022
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: 330a17e17dcad64d42756656a4e5f3c278829b4d
awgreene pushed a commit to awgreene/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2022
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: 330a17e17dcad64d42756656a4e5f3c278829b4d
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2022
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: 330a17e17dcad64d42756656a4e5f3c278829b4d
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2022
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: 330a17e17dcad64d42756656a4e5f3c278829b4d
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2022
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: 330a17e17dcad64d42756656a4e5f3c278829b4d
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2022
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: 330a17e17dcad64d42756656a4e5f3c278829b4d
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: 330a17e17dcad64d42756656a4e5f3c278829b4d
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: 330a17e17dcad64d42756656a4e5f3c278829b4d
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: 330a17e17dcad64d42756656a4e5f3c278829b4d
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: 330a17e17dcad64d42756656a4e5f3c278829b4d
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: 330a17e17dcad64d42756656a4e5f3c278829b4d
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2022
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: 330a17e17dcad64d42756656a4e5f3c278829b4d
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2022
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: 330a17e17dcad64d42756656a4e5f3c278829b4d
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2022
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: 330a17e17dcad64d42756656a4e5f3c278829b4d
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2022
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: 330a17e17dcad64d42756656a4e5f3c278829b4d
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2022
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: 330a17e17dcad64d42756656a4e5f3c278829b4d
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2022
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: 330a17e17dcad64d42756656a4e5f3c278829b4d
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2022
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: 330a17e17dcad64d42756656a4e5f3c278829b4d
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants