-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
OLM-2690: Subscription affinity #359
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OLM-2690: Subscription affinity #359
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: perdasilva The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/hold for qe approval |
/lgtm |
a384cef
to
e7a2508
Compare
/retest |
/label docs-approved |
…penshift#250) Signed-off-by: perdasilva <[email protected]> Upstream-commit: f8da7254a5aabb477235d297f080af29f7fb0be4 Upstream-repository: api
….config (openshift#250)" This reverts commit f8da7254a5aabb477235d297f080af29f7fb0be4. Upstream-commit: 5490427930e127437fec9224e59cee50405ca131 Upstream-repository: api
Signed-off-by: perdasilva <[email protected]> Upstream-commit: ae4da2a9ec6a5c8e8725f62eecd5c18bb1816658 Upstream-repository: api
* vendor new o_f/api version Signed-off-by: perdasilva <[email protected]> * Update olm controller to handle Subscription.config.affinity Signed-off-by: perdasilva <[email protected]> Upstream-commit: 55230179df33811fce196cca595c474bf4faaeff Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Signed-off-by: perdasilva <[email protected]> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: 82d17f39785d0e7fdc0d6b77c35209c5c915bad6
e7a2508
to
e40c77d
Compare
/retest |
2 similar comments
/retest |
/retest |
/assign @bandrade |
@bandrade any ETA on this one? |
@perdasilva @jianzhangbjz I'm working on it. I should finish tomorrow. Sorry for the late response |
Testing scenario 1 - CR with NodeAffinity defined, POD should be scheduled in a specific node
Testing scenario 2 - CR with anti-affinity defined, POD should not be scheduled in a node with a specific label defined.
/lgtm |
/unhold |
@perdasilva: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
This PR brings down changes to the Subscription API that allows users to override the pod.spec.affinity of the operator deployment to enable deployment into multi-arch clusters