Skip to content

[release-4.11] OCPBUGS-3876: Order an operator CR's status.Component.Refs array (#2880) #413

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #411

/assign awgreene

Problem: The operator CR's status includes a list of componenets owned
by the operator. The list of components are ordered by GVK, but the
order of objects with the same GVK may change. If an operator owns many
components, there is a high likelyhood that OLM will continuously
update the status of the operator CR because the order of its
components have changed,

Solution: Order an operators component references so OLM does not
attempt to update the status of the operator CR.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Greene <[email protected]>

Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: 793a7cc20d18f4907fc17ce2a0cebbca9a0f00be
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3795 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3876. Retitling PR to link against new bug.
/retitle [release-4.11] OCPBUGS-3876: Order an operator CR's status.Component.Refs array (#2880)

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #411

/assign awgreene

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.11] OCPBUGS-3795: Order an operator CR's status.Component.Refs array (#2880) [release-4.11] OCPBUGS-3876: Order an operator CR's status.Component.Refs array (#2880) Nov 18, 2022
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/severity-critical Referenced Jira bug's severity is critical for the branch this PR is targeting. label Nov 18, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 18, 2022

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

[release-4.11] OCPBUGS-3876: Order an operator CR's status.Component.Refs array (#2880)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Nov 18, 2022
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3876, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3795 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #411

/assign awgreene

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@awgreene
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@ankitathomas
Copy link
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 8, 2022
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@ankitathomas: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3876, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.11.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.11.z)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3795 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3795 targets the "4.12.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.12.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jianzhangbjz

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from jianzhangbjz December 8, 2022 19:39
@ankitathomas
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Contributor

Test passed, details: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-3876
/label qe-approved
/label cherry-pick-apporved
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Dec 19, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 19, 2022

@jianzhangbjz: The label(s) /label cherry-pick-apporved cannot be applied. These labels are supported: platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash, px-approved, docs-approved, qe-approved, downstream-change-needed, approved, backport-risk-assessed, bugzilla/valid-bug, cherry-pick-approved, jira/valid-bug, staff-eng-approved. Is this label configured under labels -> additional_labels or labels -> restricted_labels in plugin.yaml?

In response to this:

Test passed, details: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-3876
/label qe-approved
/label cherry-pick-apporved
/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 19, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@anik120 anik120 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

test /e2e-gcp-olm-flaky

@anik120
Copy link
Contributor

anik120 commented Jan 16, 2023

/retest

@anik120
Copy link
Contributor

anik120 commented Jan 16, 2023

Last run failed on one flaky test:

Global Catalog Exclusion when a subscription referring to the local catalog is created when the operator group is annotated with olm.operatorframework.io/exclude-global-namespace-resolution=true [FLAKE] the broken subscription should resolve and have state AtLatest 

/retest

Copy link
Contributor

@anik120 anik120 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 16, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: anik120, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@anik120
Copy link
Contributor

anik120 commented Jan 16, 2023

/retest

@awgreene
Copy link
Contributor

/retest
/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Jan 16, 2023
@awgreene
Copy link
Contributor

@jianzhangbjz it seems like the cherry-pick label was misspelled last time you attempted to apply it, would you mind re-applying the label?

@anik120
Copy link
Contributor

anik120 commented Jan 17, 2023

@awgreene looks like the e2e-gcp-olm-flaky test is failing again on the same test:

Global Catalog Exclusion when a subscription referring to the local catalog is created when the operator group is annotated with olm.operatorframework.io/exclude-global-namespace-resolution=true [FLAKE] the broken subscription should resolve and have state AtLatest

Probably worth running that test locally for this branch and making sure it's not an actual test failure before we trigger CI again.

@anik120
Copy link
Contributor

anik120 commented Jan 17, 2023

Triggering it one last time so that it runs overnight and we have the results tomorrow morning

/test e2e-gcp-olm-flaky

@awgreene
Copy link
Contributor

@anik120 the test passed locally:

$ make e2e/olm
/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin/make e2e WHAT=operator-lifecycle-manager E2E_CATALOG_NS=openshift-marketplace E2E_INSTALL_NS=openshift-operator-lifecycle-manager E2E_TEST_NS=openshift-operators E2E_TIMEOUT=120m KUBECTL=oc
scripts/e2e.sh
~/dev/github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/staging/operator-lifecycle-manager ~/dev/github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm
Populating nested vendor directory
all modules verified
Running operator-lifecycle-manager e2e tests
GO111MODULE=on GOFLAGS="-mod=vendor -buildvcs=false" go run github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2/ginkgo     -flake-attempts 1 -nodes 1 -timeout 120m -v -randomize-suites -race -trace -progress ./test/e2e  -- -namespace=openshift-operators -olmNamespace=openshift-operator-lifecycle-manager -catalogNamespace=openshift-marketplace -dummyImage=bitnami/nginx:latest -kubeconfig=/Users/agreene/Downloads/cluster-bot-2023-01-17-144614.kubeconfig.txt
Running Suite: End-to-end - /Users/agreene/dev/github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/test/e2e
======================================================================================================================================
Random Seed: 1673972311

Will run 1 of 199 specs
------------------------------
[BeforeSuite]
/Users/agreene/dev/github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/test/e2e/e2e_test.go:77
[BeforeSuite] TOP-LEVEL
  /Users/agreene/dev/github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/test/e2e/e2e_test.go:77
------------------------------
[BeforeSuite] PASSED [0.585 seconds]
[BeforeSuite]
/Users/agreene/dev/github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/test/e2e/e2e_test.go:77

  Begin Captured GinkgoWriter Output >>
    [BeforeSuite] TOP-LEVEL
      /Users/agreene/dev/github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/test/e2e/e2e_test.go:77
  << End Captured GinkgoWriter Output
------------------------------
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
------------------------------
Global Catalog Exclusion when a subscription referring to the local catalog is created when the operator group is annotated with olm.operatorframework.io/exclude-global-namespace-resolution=true
  the broken subscription should resolve and have state AtLatest
  /Users/agreene/dev/github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/test/e2e/catalog_exclusion_test.go:111
[BeforeEach] Global Catalog Exclusion
  /Users/agreene/dev/github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/test/e2e/catalog_exclusion_test.go:31
STEP: creating a namespace with an own namespace operator group without annotations 01/17/23 08:18:49.031
created the global-catalog-exclusion-e2e-5fpw7 testing namespace
STEP: creating a broken catalog in the global namespace 01/17/23 08:18:49.116
STEP: creating a healthy catalog in the test namespace 01/17/23 08:18:49.181
STEP: checking that the global catalog is broken 01/17/23 08:19:05.364
expecting catalog source last connection state 'CONNECTING' to be 'TRANSIENT_FAILURE'
expecting catalog source last connection state 'CONNECTING' to be 'TRANSIENT_FAILURE'
expecting catalog source last connection state 'CONNECTING' to be 'TRANSIENT_FAILURE'
expecting catalog source last connection state 'CONNECTING' to be 'TRANSIENT_FAILURE'
expecting catalog source last connection state 'TRANSIENT_FAILURE' to be 'TRANSIENT_FAILURE'
[BeforeEach] when a subscription referring to the local catalog is created
  /Users/agreene/dev/github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/test/e2e/catalog_exclusion_test.go:89
STEP: creating a subscription 01/17/23 08:19:09.539
[It] the broken subscription should resolve and have state AtLatest
  /Users/agreene/dev/github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/test/e2e/catalog_exclusion_test.go:111
STEP: checking that the subscription is not resolving and has a condition with type ResolutionFailed 01/17/23 08:19:09.612
expecting subscription condition type 'ResolutionFailed' to be in [CatalogSourcesUnhealthy]
expecting subscription condition type 'ResolutionFailed' to be in [CatalogSourcesUnhealthy ResolutionFailed]
STEP: annotating the operator group with olm.operatorframework.io/exclude-global-namespace-resolution=true 01/17/23 08:19:10.691
STEP: checking that the subscription resolves and has state AtLatest 01/17/23 08:19:10.77
expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state 'UpgradePending' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state 'UpgradePending' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state 'UpgradePending' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state 'UpgradePending' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state 'UpgradePending' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state 'UpgradePending' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state 'UpgradePending' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state 'UpgradePending' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state 'UpgradePending' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state 'UpgradePending' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state 'UpgradePending' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state 'UpgradePending' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state 'UpgradePending' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
expecting subscription state 'AtLatestKnown' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
[AfterEach] Global Catalog Exclusion
  /Users/agreene/dev/github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/test/e2e/catalog_exclusion_test.go:82
tearing down the global-catalog-exclusion-e2e-5fpw7 namespace
resetting e2e kube client
deleting global-catalog-exclusion-e2e-5fpw7/local-subscription-j2nbp
deleting global-catalog-exclusion-e2e-5fpw7/good-catsrc-72mrf
deleting global-catalog-exclusion-e2e-5fpw7/good-catsrc-72mrf-svc
deleting global-catalog-exclusion-e2e-5fpw7/good-catsrc-72mrf-pod
deleting global-catalog-exclusion-e2e-5fpw7/good-catsrc-72mrf-configmap
deleting openshift-marketplace/bad-global-catalog-bw6ms
deleting global-catalog-exclusion-e2e-5fpw7/og-x72zq
deleting <global>/global-catalog-exclusion-e2e-5fpw7
garbage collecting CRDs
------------------------------
• [SLOW TEST] [56.398 seconds]
Global Catalog Exclusion
/Users/agreene/dev/github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/test/e2e/catalog_exclusion_test.go:23
  when a subscription referring to the local catalog is created
  /Users/agreene/dev/github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/test/e2e/catalog_exclusion_test.go:86
    when the operator group is annotated with olm.operatorframework.io/exclude-global-namespace-resolution=true
    /Users/agreene/dev/github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/test/e2e/catalog_exclusion_test.go:108
      the broken subscription should resolve and have state AtLatest
      /Users/agreene/dev/github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/test/e2e/catalog_exclusion_test.go:111

  Begin Captured GinkgoWriter Output >>
    [BeforeEach] Global Catalog Exclusion
      /Users/agreene/dev/github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/test/e2e/catalog_exclusion_test.go:31
    STEP: creating a namespace with an own namespace operator group without annotations 01/17/23 08:18:49.031
    created the global-catalog-exclusion-e2e-5fpw7 testing namespace
    STEP: creating a broken catalog in the global namespace 01/17/23 08:18:49.116
    STEP: creating a healthy catalog in the test namespace 01/17/23 08:18:49.181
    STEP: checking that the global catalog is broken 01/17/23 08:19:05.364
    expecting catalog source last connection state 'CONNECTING' to be 'TRANSIENT_FAILURE'
    expecting catalog source last connection state 'CONNECTING' to be 'TRANSIENT_FAILURE'
    expecting catalog source last connection state 'CONNECTING' to be 'TRANSIENT_FAILURE'
    expecting catalog source last connection state 'CONNECTING' to be 'TRANSIENT_FAILURE'
    expecting catalog source last connection state 'TRANSIENT_FAILURE' to be 'TRANSIENT_FAILURE'
    [BeforeEach] when a subscription referring to the local catalog is created
      /Users/agreene/dev/github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/test/e2e/catalog_exclusion_test.go:89
    STEP: creating a subscription 01/17/23 08:19:09.539
    [It] the broken subscription should resolve and have state AtLatest
      /Users/agreene/dev/github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/test/e2e/catalog_exclusion_test.go:111
    STEP: checking that the subscription is not resolving and has a condition with type ResolutionFailed 01/17/23 08:19:09.612
    expecting subscription condition type 'ResolutionFailed' to be in [CatalogSourcesUnhealthy]
    expecting subscription condition type 'ResolutionFailed' to be in [CatalogSourcesUnhealthy ResolutionFailed]
    STEP: annotating the operator group with olm.operatorframework.io/exclude-global-namespace-resolution=true 01/17/23 08:19:10.691
    STEP: checking that the subscription resolves and has state AtLatest 01/17/23 08:19:10.77
    expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state '' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state 'UpgradePending' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state 'UpgradePending' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state 'UpgradePending' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state 'UpgradePending' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state 'UpgradePending' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state 'UpgradePending' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state 'UpgradePending' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state 'UpgradePending' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state 'UpgradePending' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state 'UpgradePending' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state 'UpgradePending' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state 'UpgradePending' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state 'UpgradePending' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    expecting subscription state 'AtLatestKnown' to be 'AtLatestKnown'
    [AfterEach] Global Catalog Exclusion
      /Users/agreene/dev/github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/test/e2e/catalog_exclusion_test.go:82
    tearing down the global-catalog-exclusion-e2e-5fpw7 namespace
    resetting e2e kube client
    deleting global-catalog-exclusion-e2e-5fpw7/local-subscription-j2nbp
    deleting global-catalog-exclusion-e2e-5fpw7/good-catsrc-72mrf
    deleting global-catalog-exclusion-e2e-5fpw7/good-catsrc-72mrf-svc
    deleting global-catalog-exclusion-e2e-5fpw7/good-catsrc-72mrf-pod
    deleting global-catalog-exclusion-e2e-5fpw7/good-catsrc-72mrf-configmap
    deleting openshift-marketplace/bad-global-catalog-bw6ms
    deleting global-catalog-exclusion-e2e-5fpw7/og-x72zq
    deleting <global>/global-catalog-exclusion-e2e-5fpw7
    garbage collecting CRDs
  << End Captured GinkgoWriter Output
------------------------------
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
------------------------------
[AfterSuite]
/Users/agreene/dev/github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/test/e2e/e2e_test.go:123
[AfterSuite] TOP-LEVEL
  /Users/agreene/dev/github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/test/e2e/e2e_test.go:123
------------------------------
[AfterSuite] PASSED [0.000 seconds]
[AfterSuite]
/Users/agreene/dev/github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/test/e2e/e2e_test.go:123

  Begin Captured GinkgoWriter Output >>
    [AfterSuite] TOP-LEVEL
      /Users/agreene/dev/github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/test/e2e/e2e_test.go:123
  << End Captured GinkgoWriter Output
------------------------------

Ran 1 of 199 Specs in 57.002 seconds
SUCCESS! -- 1 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 198 Skipped
PASS | FOCUSED

@awgreene
Copy link
Contributor

For what it's worth, there's a comment calling out that this test typically fails in OpenShift CI, likely due to resource constraints:

// Note: this test flakes on openshift CI but passes running on a local openshift cluster
// For some reason, the subscription does not transition to a failed state in time

@awgreene
Copy link
Contributor

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-olm-flaky

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 17, 2023

@awgreene: Overrode contexts on behalf of awgreene: ci/prow/e2e-gcp-olm-flaky

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-olm-flaky

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Contributor

/label cherry-pick-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Jan 18, 2023
@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Contributor

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-olm-flaky

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 18, 2023

@jianzhangbjz: jianzhangbjz unauthorized: /override is restricted to Repo administrators, approvers in top level OWNERS file, and the following github teams:openshift: openshift-release-oversight.

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-olm-flaky

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD cb6810a and 2 for PR HEAD 05c3a52 in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 18, 2023

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 7fdc3c5 into openshift:release-4.11 Jan 18, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3876 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #411

/assign awgreene

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@awgreene
Copy link
Contributor

/cherry-pick release-4.10

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Author

@awgreene: new pull request created: #432

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.10

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

tmshort pushed a commit to tmshort/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2025
)

Bumps [sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime) from 0.20.2 to 0.20.3.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime/blob/main/RELEASE.md)
- [Commits](kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime@v0.20.2...v0.20.3)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: 78ed98e0418e012aeca253f985898d659d62defc
tmshort pushed a commit to tmshort/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2025
)

Bumps [sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime) from 0.20.2 to 0.20.3.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime/blob/main/RELEASE.md)
- [Commits](kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime@v0.20.2...v0.20.3)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: 78ed98e0418e012aeca253f985898d659d62defc
tmshort pushed a commit to tmshort/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2025
)

Bumps [sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime) from 0.20.2 to 0.20.3.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime/blob/main/RELEASE.md)
- [Commits](kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime@v0.20.2...v0.20.3)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: 78ed98e0418e012aeca253f985898d659d62defc
tmshort pushed a commit to tmshort/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2025
)

Bumps [sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime) from 0.20.2 to 0.20.3.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime/blob/main/RELEASE.md)
- [Commits](kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime@v0.20.2...v0.20.3)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: 78ed98e0418e012aeca253f985898d659d62defc
grokspawn pushed a commit to grokspawn/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2025
)

Bumps [sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime) from 0.20.2 to 0.20.3.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime/blob/main/RELEASE.md)
- [Commits](kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime@v0.20.2...v0.20.3)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: 78ed98e0418e012aeca253f985898d659d62defc
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. jira/severity-critical Referenced Jira bug's severity is critical for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants