-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
[release-4.12] OCPBUGS-7556: Defuse E2e timebomb #449
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.12] OCPBUGS-7556: Defuse E2e timebomb #449
Conversation
Signed-off-by: perdasilva <[email protected]> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: a3da4ea46d4bf5e704424893259ba5a0ae25d1e6
Signed-off-by: perdasilva <[email protected]> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: bb7b211
Signed-off-by: perdasilva <[email protected]> Upstream-Repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: 4a28010
@grokspawn: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@grokspawn: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-7556, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@grokspawn: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: grokspawn, perdasilva The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/override ci/prow/verify
|
@perdasilva: Overrode contexts on behalf of perdasilva: ci/prow/verify In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
/retest |
/label backport-risk-assessed |
@grokspawn: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-7556 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@grokspawn: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
This downstreams OCPBUGS-7102 and also disables this particular plugin since SCC is set to legacy and we are not enforcing PSA or labeling namespaces.