Skip to content

[release-4.11] OCPBUGS-16075: fix dynamic conversion webhook #536

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 15, 2023

Conversation

perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

@perdasilva perdasilva commented Aug 10, 2023

Copy of #508:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #503

#508 was blocked by CI because of the global catalog changes we put in had a problem downstream. How they got in, I don't know.

tchughesiv and others added 3 commits July 12, 2023 03:04
Signed-off-by: Tommy Hughes <[email protected]>
Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: 858c7cdb2f4cfe3d351225972aede54e3b114ce4
Signed-off-by: perdasilva <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: timflannagan <[email protected]>

Upstream-commit: c652154fd7eeb72a23f78856b2cbade775efad41
Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 10, 2023
@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@perdasilva perdasilva changed the title [WIP] Pr 508 [WIP] [release-4.11] OCPBUGS-16075: fix dynamic conversion webhook Aug 10, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 10, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-16075, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.11.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.11.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-15858 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-15858 targets the "4.12.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.12.0, 4.12.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @kuiwang02

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@perdasilva perdasilva changed the title [WIP] [release-4.11] OCPBUGS-16075: fix dynamic conversion webhook [release-4.11] OCPBUGS-16075: fix dynamic conversion webhook Aug 10, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from kuiwang02 August 10, 2023 15:56
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 10, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-16075, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.11.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.11.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-15858 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-15858 targets the "4.12.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.12.0, 4.12.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @kuiwang02

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Copy of #508:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #503

#508 was blocked by CI because of the global catalog changes we put in had a problem downstream. How they got in, I don't know.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Aug 10, 2023
@kuiwang02
Copy link

/label cherry-pick-approved
/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR labels Aug 11, 2023
@kuiwang02
Copy link

/hold

because I am doing pre-verifying. after that, I will cancel hold.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 11, 2023
@kuiwang02
Copy link

pre-verify pass.

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 11, 2023
@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick release-4.10

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@perdasilva: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.10 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.10

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link
Contributor

@m1kola m1kola left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 14, 2023
@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor Author

/approve

Copy link
Contributor

@tmshort tmshort left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@awgreene
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

1 similar comment
@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor Author

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 15, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: awgreene, m1kola, perdasilva, tmshort

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 15, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 15, 2023

@perdasilva: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit c97e06c into openshift:release-4.11 Aug 15, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@perdasilva: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-16075: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-16075 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Copy of #508:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #503

#508 was blocked by CI because of the global catalog changes we put in had a problem downstream. How they got in, I don't know.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@perdasilva: #536 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.10":

Applying: fix dynamic conversion webhook (#2912)
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/pkg/controller/operators/olm/apiservices.go
M	staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/pkg/controller/operators/olm/operator.go
M	staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/pkg/controller/operators/olm/operator_test.go
M	vendor/github.com/operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager/pkg/controller/operators/olm/apiservices.go
M	vendor/github.com/operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager/pkg/controller/operators/olm/operator.go
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging vendor/github.com/operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager/pkg/controller/operators/olm/operator.go
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in vendor/github.com/operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager/pkg/controller/operators/olm/operator.go
Auto-merging vendor/github.com/operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager/pkg/controller/operators/olm/apiservices.go
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in vendor/github.com/operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager/pkg/controller/operators/olm/apiservices.go
Auto-merging staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/pkg/controller/operators/olm/operator_test.go
Auto-merging staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/pkg/controller/operators/olm/operator.go
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/pkg/controller/operators/olm/operator.go
Auto-merging staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/pkg/controller/operators/olm/apiservices.go
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/pkg/controller/operators/olm/apiservices.go
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 fix dynamic conversion webhook (#2912)
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.10

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.