-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
[release-4.13] OCPBUGS-27649,OCPBUGS-27564,OCPBUGS-27654,OCPBUGS-27569: bump go-git/v5 to 5.11.0 #682
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.13] OCPBUGS-27649,OCPBUGS-27564,OCPBUGS-27654,OCPBUGS-27569: bump go-git/v5 to 5.11.0 #682
Conversation
@anik120: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27649, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27564, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27654, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27569, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Things to Note
:
// pin to ginkgo v1 version of gomega (v1.18+ relies on ginkgo v2) | ||
github.com/onsi/gomega => github.com/onsi/gomega v1.17.0 | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was introduced by DanS here, that was removed in 4.14. Had to remove it from 4.13 manually to get dependencies to resolve correctly. This was not a part of @grokspawn's commit.
} | ||
b.WriteString("}") | ||
return b.Bytes(), nil | ||
// Ensure for add and replace we emit `value: null` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are changes to the vendor folder after pulling in @ankitathomas's commit, which is new for 4.13. There were no changes to the vendor folder after pulling in the commit until 4.14.
/label backport-risk-assessed |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
Signed-off-by: Jordan Keister <[email protected]> Upstream-repository: operator-registry Upstream-commit: 146320b6da253cde65c18461796e19840fc04f0a
Signed-off-by: Ankita Thomas <[email protected]> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: 134cceeb21059dbcbcef68e95c623dc83fede4fe
e57063c
to
2dfb259
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: anik120, ankitathomas The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
@anik120: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
@anik120: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27649: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27649 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27564: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27564 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27654: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27654 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27569: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27569 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] This PR has been included in build operator-lifecycle-manager-container-v4.13.0-202402072037.p0.g4cc5232.assembly.stream.el8 for distgit operator-lifecycle-manager. |
Fix included in accepted release 4.13.0-0.nightly-2024-02-07-232248 |
Fix for CVE-2023-49568 and CVE-2023-49569 for OLM and operator-registry.