OCPBUGS-31842: copy-content: delete destination dirs before copying (#3197)

[joelanford]

Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: 3ed3c63ea9f724da7d51062ab7f21da611dc6628

[openshift-ci-robot]

@joelanford: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-31842, which is invalid:

• expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-31842 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.16.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: 3ed3c63ea9f724da7d51062ab7f21da611dc6628

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: joelanford

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• DOWNSTREAM_OWNERS [joelanford]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci]

@joelanford: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[perdasilva]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-31842, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.15.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.15.z)
• bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
• dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-31850 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
• dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-31850 targets the "4.16.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.16.0
• bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[perdasilva]

/label backport-risk-assessed

[perdasilva]

please also make sure master/4.16 is good. The parent bug is here. The fix came through a downstream sync PR.

[openshift-ci]

@perdasilva: The label(s) /label lgtm cannot be applied. These labels are supported: acknowledge-critical-fixes-only, platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash, px-approved, docs-approved, qe-approved, no-qe, downstream-change-needed, rebase/manual, cluster-config-api-changed, approved, backport-risk-assessed, bugzilla/valid-bug, cherry-pick-approved, jira/valid-bug, staff-eng-approved. Is this label configured under labels -> additional_labels or labels -> restricted_labels in plugin.yaml?

In response to this:

/label lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[KeenonLee]

/label cherry-pick-approved

[openshift-ci-robot]

@joelanford: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-31842: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

• openshift/operator-framework-olm#728

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-31842 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: 3ed3c63ea9f724da7d51062ab7f21da611dc6628

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-bot]

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

This PR has been included in build operator-lifecycle-manager-container-v4.15.0-202404090811.p0.g764c6fe.assembly.stream.el9 for distgit operator-lifecycle-manager.
All builds following this will include this PR.