-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 72
[release-4.16] OCPBUGS-48696: Fix excessive catalog source snapshots cause severe performance regression #957
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.16] OCPBUGS-48696: Fix excessive catalog source snapshots cause severe performance regression #957
Conversation
@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-48696, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: perdasilva The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
…to GRPC server (#3490) * add log and metric to instrument count of catalog source snapshots Signed-off-by: Joe Lanford <[email protected]> * use operator cache provider for deprecation updates to limit calls to GRPC server Signed-off-by: Joe Lanford <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: Joe Lanford <[email protected]> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: 1274d54d885649786733d0b3fe499e9670f3310d
…non-determinism (#3491) Signed-off-by: Joe Lanford <[email protected]> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: 451e775ea03eb9280399ba0abaf19bd237df167c
acad03d
to
88a1bbf
Compare
/label backport-risk-assessed |
@perdasilva: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/lgtm |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
/jira refresh |
@oceanc80: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-48696, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/hold |
pre-verify pass |
/jira refresh |
@oceanc80: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-48696, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
48d68f5
into
openshift:release-4.16
@perdasilva: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-48696: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-48696 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: ose-operator-framework-tools |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: operator-lifecycle-manager |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: operator-registry |
This is a manual cherry-pick of #937