Skip to content

[release-4.17] OCPBUGS-53071: add missing pod disruption reasons to isPodDead #982

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #981

/assign anik120

isPodDead had checks for TerminationByKubelet and DeletionByTaintManager.
It was missing checks for

PreemptionByScheduler
EvictionByEvictionAPI
DeletionByPodGC

ref: https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/workloads/pods/disruptions/#pod-disruption-conditions

This PR adds those reasons.

Signed-off-by: Anik Bhattacharjee <[email protected]>
Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: 59bfe7f2225dd96ca5690157ebb5d0dc7ac654f9
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-53040 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-53071. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle [release-4.17] OCPBUGS-53071: add missing pod disruption reasons to isPodDead

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #981

/assign anik120

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.17] OCPBUGS-53040: add missing pod disruption reasons to isPodDead [release-4.17] OCPBUGS-53071: add missing pod disruption reasons to isPodDead Mar 13, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Mar 13, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-53071, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-53040 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #981

/assign anik120

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from grokspawn and kevinrizza March 13, 2025 12:28
@oceanc80
Copy link
Contributor

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Mar 13, 2025
@oceanc80
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 13, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 13, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: oceanc80, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 13, 2025
@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

1 similar comment
@grokspawn
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

./retest

@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Mar 24, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Mar 24, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jianzhangbjz: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-53071, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.17.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.17.z)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-53040 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-53040 targets the "4.18.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.18.0, 4.18.z
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Contributor

Test pass, details: https://issues.redhat.com//browse/OCPBUGS-53071
/label qe-approved
/label cherry-pick-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. labels Mar 24, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-53071, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.17.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.17.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-53040 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-53040 targets the "4.18.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.18.0, 4.18.z
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #981

/assign anik120

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 24, 2025

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit d3b1715 into openshift:release-4.17 Mar 24, 2025
13 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-53071: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-53071 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #981

/assign anik120

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: operator-registry
This PR has been included in build operator-registry-container-v4.17.0-202503240857.p0.gd3b1715.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: operator-lifecycle-manager
This PR has been included in build operator-lifecycle-manager-container-v4.17.0-202503240857.p0.gd3b1715.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-operator-framework-tools
This PR has been included in build ose-operator-framework-tools-container-v4.17.0-202503240857.p0.gd3b1715.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.