Skip to content

Bug 1861605: Reduce length of explanation of status of Operator resource #1713

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

simrandhaliw
Copy link
Contributor

@simrandhaliw simrandhaliw commented Aug 6, 2020

Description of the change:
This PR bumps the operator-framework/api version to v0.3.12 to include a bug fix

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 6, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@simrandhaliw: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1861605, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1861605: Reduce length of explanation of status of Operator resource

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@simrandhaliw
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 6, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@simrandhaliw: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1861605, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 6, 2020
@Bowenislandsong
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 6, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@simrandhaliw: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1861605, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1861605: Reduce length of explanation of status of Operator resource

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

1 similar comment
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@simrandhaliw: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1861605, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1861605: Reduce length of explanation of status of Operator resource

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

This PR bumps the operator-framework/api version to v0.3.12 to include a [bug fix](operator-framework/api#59)
@simrandhaliw simrandhaliw force-pushed the operatorstatus-description-bug-fix branch from c0ae913 to 51f74ee Compare August 6, 2020 19:30
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 6, 2020
@ecordell
Copy link
Member

ecordell commented Aug 7, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 7, 2020
@kevinrizza
Copy link
Member

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kevinrizza, simrandhaliw

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 7, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 6b95ea3 into operator-framework:master Aug 7, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@simrandhaliw: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager#1713, operator-framework/api#59. Bugzilla bug 1861605 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1861605: Reduce length of explanation of status of Operator resource

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants