Skip to content

wait for operatorhubio-catalog ready before test starts #2605

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

akihikokuroda
Copy link
Member

@akihikokuroda akihikokuroda commented Jan 28, 2022

Signed-off-by: akihikokuroda [email protected]

Description of the change:
Make sure operatorhubio-catalog ready before e2e test starts

Motivation for the change:
Some tests are affected by the operatorhubio-catalog not ready status. This change make the e2e test more stable.

This line checks that all registries are OK before it resolves the operator.

if err := namespacedCache.Error(); err != nil {

It's usually taking a little long time to get the operatorhubio registry ready and it sometimes causes test failures in the first a few tests.

Reviewer Checklist

  • Implementation matches the proposed design, or proposal is updated to match implementation
  • Sufficient unit test coverage
  • Sufficient end-to-end test coverage
  • Docs updated or added to /doc
  • Commit messages sensible and descriptive

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from benluddy and perdasilva January 28, 2022 15:31
@akihikokuroda
Copy link
Member Author

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 28, 2022
@akihikokuroda
Copy link
Member Author

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 28, 2022
@@ -104,6 +104,9 @@ var _ = BeforeSuite(func() {
HaveLen(1),
ContainElement(Not(BeZero())),
))
_, err := fetchCatalogSourceOnStatus(ctx.Ctx().OperatorClient(), "operatorhubio-catalog", operatorNamespace, catalogSourceRegistryPodSynced)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your contribution -- I think this makes sense and is a safe addition.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 2, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 2, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: akihikokuroda, timflannagan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 2, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit ef91a92 into operator-framework:master Feb 2, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants