-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 562
Add Uninstall feature, add Makefile commands and organize docs #898
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Uninstall feature, add Makefile commands and organize docs #898
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: camilamacedo86 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Hi @camilamacedo86. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a operator-framework or openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This PR looks pretty good to me (a lot of eye on the details!), but I'm not an OLM maintainer. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the help! I think there are a couple of issues specifically around how we support OCP <4, but otherwise this is great!
- kubectl apply -f deploy/upstream/quickstart/crds.yaml | ||
- kubectl apply -f deploy/upstream/quickstart/olm.yaml | ||
|
||
.PHONY: install-ocp |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure we should have this - OLM is already in OCP
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In OCP 4 was released, however, how to test it locally? For Minishift it still required. I removed the 3.11 for the doc and a few changes in order to make it more clear. Please, let me know what do you think and if we can move forward in this way.
install-ocp: | ||
@echo Applying upstream quick start crd | ||
- kubectl create -f deploy/ocp/manifests/latest/ | ||
- oc adm policy add-cluster-role-to-user cluster-admin system:serviceaccount:kube-system:default |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is this clusterrolebinding needed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To allow use it with Minishift.
README.md
Outdated
spec: | ||
channel: alpha | ||
name: etcd | ||
source: rh-operators |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should change these to point to the operatorhubio catalogs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did a few changes. Please, check if it is ok for you now.
doc/install/install.md
Outdated
|
||
**NOTE** It is recommended for development pruposed and will use the source locally | ||
|
||
## Minishift |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minishift is deprecated, we don't want to steer users towards it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Deprecated for OLM? Where it was deprecated? How to test it locally with OCP?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added the info that it is deprecated. I think we should keep it for a while
/ok-to-test |
Hi @ecordell, could you please re-check it? Could we move forward here? |
Hi @ecordell, All your comments were addressed. Please, could you check and let me know what still needs to be changed for we move forward here. |
Hi folks @njhale, @ecordell, @alecmerdler @jpeeler |
Hi folks @joelanford and @ecordell, if you have time, could you please give me a hand for we are able to move forward here? |
…rstanble and add missing steps
…ers to operatorhub.io
Closing it. It is open for a while and shows outdated currently. |
@camilamacedo86: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Too bad this didn't land upstream ;) I also have stuck namespace.. |
I can confirm this worked for me on Kubernetes, it got me out of the stuck namespace problem. |
Why wasn't this merged? |
@camilamacedo86: PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Motivation
#896
#789
What
make uninstall
doc
in order to follow the project and org standardsWhy
Steps to verify
make uninstall
with a local installation