You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Li Shuang reported an Oops with cls_u32 due to an use-after-free
in u32_destroy_key(). The use-after-free can be triggered with:
dev=lo
tc qdisc add dev $dev root handle 1: htb default 10
tc filter add dev $dev parent 1: prio 5 handle 1: protocol ip u32 divisor 256
tc filter add dev $dev protocol ip parent 1: prio 5 u32 ht 800:: match ip dst\
10.0.0.0/8 hashkey mask 0x0000ff00 at 16 link 1:
tc qdisc del dev $dev root
Which causes the following kasan splat:
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in u32_destroy_key.constprop.21+0x117/0x140 [cls_u32]
Read of size 4 at addr ffff881b83dae618 by task kworker/u48:5/571
CPU: 17 PID: 571 Comm: kworker/u48:5 Not tainted 4.15.0+ #87
Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R730/072T6D, BIOS 2.1.7 06/16/2016
Workqueue: tc_filter_workqueue u32_delete_key_freepf_work [cls_u32]
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0xd6/0x182
? dma_virt_map_sg+0x22e/0x22e
print_address_description+0x73/0x290
kasan_report+0x277/0x360
? u32_destroy_key.constprop.21+0x117/0x140 [cls_u32]
u32_destroy_key.constprop.21+0x117/0x140 [cls_u32]
u32_delete_key_freepf_work+0x1c/0x30 [cls_u32]
process_one_work+0xae0/0x1c80
? sched_clock+0x5/0x10
? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x3c0/0x3c0
? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x29/0x40
? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x381/0x570
? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x29/0x40
? finish_task_switch+0x1e5/0x760
? finish_task_switch+0x208/0x760
? preempt_notifier_dec+0x20/0x20
? __schedule+0x839/0x1ee0
? check_noncircular+0x20/0x20
? firmware_map_remove+0x73/0x73
? find_held_lock+0x39/0x1c0
? worker_thread+0x434/0x1820
? lock_contended+0xee0/0xee0
? lock_release+0x1100/0x1100
? init_rescuer.part.16+0x150/0x150
? retint_kernel+0x10/0x10
worker_thread+0x216/0x1820
? process_one_work+0x1c80/0x1c80
? lock_acquire+0x1a5/0x540
? lock_downgrade+0x6b0/0x6b0
? sched_clock+0x5/0x10
? lock_release+0x1100/0x1100
? compat_start_thread+0x80/0x80
? do_raw_spin_trylock+0x190/0x190
? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x29/0x40
? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x381/0x570
? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x29/0x40
? finish_task_switch+0x1e5/0x760
? finish_task_switch+0x208/0x760
? preempt_notifier_dec+0x20/0x20
? __schedule+0x839/0x1ee0
? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x143/0x320
? firmware_map_remove+0x73/0x73
? sched_clock+0x5/0x10
? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x170
? find_held_lock+0x39/0x1c0
? schedule+0xf3/0x3b0
? lock_downgrade+0x6b0/0x6b0
? __schedule+0x1ee0/0x1ee0
? do_wait_intr_irq+0x340/0x340
? do_raw_spin_trylock+0x190/0x190
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x32/0x60
? process_one_work+0x1c80/0x1c80
? process_one_work+0x1c80/0x1c80
kthread+0x312/0x3d0
? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0xc0/0xc0
ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
Allocated by task 1688:
kasan_kmalloc+0xa0/0xd0
__kmalloc+0x162/0x380
u32_change+0x1220/0x3c9e [cls_u32]
tc_ctl_tfilter+0x1ba6/0x2f80
rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x4f0/0x9d0
netlink_rcv_skb+0x124/0x320
netlink_unicast+0x430/0x600
netlink_sendmsg+0x8fa/0xd60
sock_sendmsg+0xb1/0xe0
___sys_sendmsg+0x678/0x980
__sys_sendmsg+0xc4/0x210
do_syscall_64+0x232/0x7f0
return_from_SYSCALL_64+0x0/0x75
Freed by task 112:
kasan_slab_free+0x71/0xc0
kfree+0x114/0x320
rcu_process_callbacks+0xc3f/0x1600
__do_softirq+0x2bf/0xc06
The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff881b83dae600
which belongs to the cache kmalloc-4096 of size 4096
The buggy address is located 24 bytes inside of
4096-byte region [ffff881b83dae600, ffff881b83daf600)
The buggy address belongs to the page:
page:ffffea006e0f6a00 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping: (null) index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0
flags: 0x17ffffc0008100(slab|head)
raw: 0017ffffc0008100 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000100070007
raw: dead000000000100 dead000000000200 ffff880187c0e600 0000000000000000
page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
Memory state around the buggy address:
ffff881b83dae500: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
ffff881b83dae580: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
>ffff881b83dae600: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
^
ffff881b83dae680: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
ffff881b83dae700: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
==================================================================
The problem is that the htnode is freed before the linked knodes and the
latter will try to access the first at u32_destroy_key() time.
This change addresses the issue using the htnode refcnt to guarantee
the correct free order. While at it also add a RCU annotation,
to keep sparse happy.
v1 -> v2: use rtnl_derefence() instead of RCU read locks
v2 -> v3:
- don't check refcnt in u32_destroy_hnode()
- cleaned-up u32_destroy() implementation
- cleaned-up code comment
v3 -> v4:
- dropped unneeded comment
Reported-by: Li Shuang <[email protected]>
Fixes: c0d378e ("net_sched: use tcf_queue_work() in u32 filter")
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
0 commit comments