Skip to content

DOC: suppress warnings for Panel4D deprecation #13989

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member

Other options is to just remove those sections in the latest docs ... (they are always available in the older ones).

The example in the HDF5 docs with a legacy file will have to be updated to not include Panel4D, or the reading of such files will have to be adapted in the future to handle those when Panel4D is actually removed (@jreback)

@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche added this to the 0.19.0 milestone Aug 13, 2016
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Aug 13, 2016

hmm I think removing them and pointing the old docs is better?

though the precedent is to leave them iirc (eg remote data)

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Aug 13, 2016

Current coverage is 85.28% (diff: 100%)

Merging #13989 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%

@@             master     #13989   diff @@
==========================================
  Files           139        139          
  Lines         50206      50206          
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches          0          0          
==========================================
- Hits          42818      42817     -1   
- Misses         7388       7389     +1   
  Partials          0          0          

Powered by Codecov. Last update 29d9e24...7d067aa

@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member Author

yep, will leave them in for now

@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche merged commit 6f88416 into pandas-dev:master Aug 13, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants