Skip to content

TST: Iterrows making incorrect assumptions about datetime #26441

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 18, 2019

Conversation

simonjayhawkins
Copy link
Member

@simonjayhawkins simonjayhawkins commented May 17, 2019

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 17, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #26441 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #26441      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.73%   91.72%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         174      174              
  Lines       50738    50738              
==========================================
- Hits        46545    46541       -4     
- Misses       4193     4197       +4
Flag Coverage Δ
#multiple 90.23% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
#single 41.7% <ø> (-0.06%) ⬇️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pandas/io/gbq.py 78.94% <0%> (-10.53%) ⬇️
pandas/core/frame.py 97.02% <0%> (-0.12%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ebe6b91...48cba63. Read the comment docs.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 17, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #26441 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #26441      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.73%   91.72%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         174      174              
  Lines       50745    50745              
==========================================
- Hits        46551    46547       -4     
- Misses       4194     4198       +4
Flag Coverage Δ
#multiple 90.23% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
#single 41.69% <ø> (-0.09%) ⬇️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pandas/io/gbq.py 78.94% <0%> (-10.53%) ⬇️
pandas/core/frame.py 97.02% <0%> (-0.12%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a7d3cc9...54ffcb4. Read the comment docs.

@gfyoung gfyoung added Dtype Conversions Unexpected or buggy dtype conversions Testing pandas testing functions or related to the test suite labels May 18, 2019
@jreback jreback added this to the 0.25.0 milestone May 18, 2019
@jreback jreback merged commit ffbbc49 into pandas-dev:master May 18, 2019
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented May 18, 2019

thanks @simonjayhawkins

@simonjayhawkins simonjayhawkins deleted the test_iterrows_corner branch May 18, 2019 21:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Dtype Conversions Unexpected or buggy dtype conversions Testing pandas testing functions or related to the test suite
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Iterrows making incorrect assumptions about datetime
3 participants