Skip to content

PERF: timeseries comparison ops #38248

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2020
Merged

Conversation

jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

Locally this gets me to within 3-4% of 1.1.4 on the asv mentioned in #37462

@jreback jreback added Performance Memory or execution speed performance Datetime Datetime data dtype labels Dec 3, 2020
@jreback jreback added this to the 1.1.5 milestone Dec 3, 2020
@jreback jreback changed the title PERF: #37462 PERF: timeseries comparison ops Dec 3, 2020
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Dec 3, 2020

@jbrockmendel just confirming, but I believe this is for 1.1.5 right?

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member Author

i think so, best to ask @simonjayhawkins

@simonjayhawkins
Copy link
Member

@jbrockmendel just confirming, but I believe this is for 1.1.5 right?

comment from #37462 (comment)

This seems to be caused by #37313

so IIUC no need to backport.

@simonjayhawkins simonjayhawkins modified the milestones: 1.1.5, 1.2 Dec 3, 2020
@jreback jreback merged commit d419ab4 into pandas-dev:master Dec 3, 2020
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Dec 3, 2020

thanks @jbrockmendel

@jbrockmendel jbrockmendel deleted the perf-cmp branch December 3, 2020 15:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Datetime Datetime data dtype Performance Memory or execution speed performance
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

PERF: performance regression in timeseries/timestamp comparison (ASV)
3 participants