-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.6k
CLN: groupby.ops follow-up cleanup #41204
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bf5f4d9
REF: move most of _cython_operation to WrappedCythonOp
jbrockmendel 6f056af
TYP: avoid ignores
jbrockmendel ef73bdc
TYP: fix ignores in groupby.ops
jbrockmendel 9205849
final __init__
jbrockmendel f5087c5
Merge branch 'master' into ref-gbops-followups
jbrockmendel 6b7aa90
Merge branch 'master' into ref-gbops-followups
jbrockmendel File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would a TypeVar work here? Might end up being useful elsewhere too
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i dont think that would be accurate here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Might be misunderstanding overloads, but is this expressing
ExtensionDtype -> ExtensionDtype
andnp.dtype -> np.dtype
?So was thinking a TypeVar like
TypeVar('DtypeObjT', np.dtype, ExtensionDtype)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do TypeVars not preserve subclasses?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Running
mypy
on something likegives no error, so I don't think subclasses are preserved.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cool. will make a separate PR to implement DtypeObjT
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
implenting this with DtypeObjT and getting rid of the overloads im seeing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will have time to look in more detail later, initial guess would be that this return is the problem
pandas/pandas/core/groupby/ops.py
Lines 288 to 290 in 59b2db1
IIRC mypy can't narrow based on type equality, so it's thinking that an
ExtensionDtype
can hit that return. But then not sure why it wouldn't complain with the overload, but those are confusing :)