Skip to content

Remove gatekeeper #22

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 29, 2016
Merged

Remove gatekeeper #22

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 29, 2016

Conversation

drew-gross
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@@ -67,7 +66,7 @@ const FIELD_TYPE = {
'Request Type' : 'String',
'Class' : 'String',
'Event Name' : 'String',
'Dimensions' : check_gatekeeper('explorer_json_scalar') ? 'JSON' : 'String',
'Dimensions' : false ? 'JSON' : 'String',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm why not just have 'Dimensions' : 'String' ?

@drew-gross
Copy link
Contributor Author

The idea is that in-progress features don't have to stop being in-progress. We can't just use gatekeepers anymore, but I want to have some sort of feature flag. Going into the source and changing a false to true is sortof a stopgap solution to that problem.

@peterdotjs
Copy link
Contributor

got it - maybe add some comment/tag to keep track of it and grepability

@drew-gross
Copy link
Contributor Author

sure will do

drew-gross added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 29, 2016
@drew-gross drew-gross merged commit e24e33d into master Feb 29, 2016
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link

@drew-gross updated the pull request.

@peterdotjs peterdotjs deleted the remove-gks branch March 9, 2016 06:48
douglasmuraoka pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants