Skip to content

Spice up intro #60

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 2, 2016
Merged

Spice up intro #60

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 2, 2016

Conversation

ddeboer
Copy link
Contributor

@ddeboer ddeboer commented Jan 2, 2016

No description provided.

@sagikazarmark
Copy link
Member

WTF is happening with the diff?

@ddeboer
Copy link
Contributor Author

ddeboer commented Jan 2, 2016

Yeah, this one failing just like #58. Let’s wait for GH support’s answer.

@dbu
Copy link
Contributor

dbu commented Jan 2, 2016

looked at the diff on the cli and i like the changes a lot. imo we can merge this.

one thing i wonder is whether we should not mention the message factories more prominently. besides the Httplug interface, they are key to build a client application that is not dependent on concrete implementations. whithout a factory, you would still have hard coupling to the message classes.

@sagikazarmark
Copy link
Member

👍

ddeboer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2016
@ddeboer ddeboer merged commit 5946c4b into master Jan 2, 2016
@ddeboer ddeboer deleted the spice-up-intro branch January 2, 2016 11:22
@ddeboer
Copy link
Contributor Author

ddeboer commented Jan 2, 2016

@dbu Agreed on the message factories: we should describe them in one or two sentences in the intro.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants