Skip to content

Fix/5.9.x missing with parser token #574

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

niconoe-
Copy link
Contributor

Resolves #563

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.79%. Comparing base (716d545) to head (39bd6bf).
Report is 9 commits behind head on 5.9.x.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              5.9.x     #574   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     96.79%   96.79%           
- Complexity     2257     2258    +1     
=========================================
  Files            69       69           
  Lines          5172     5174    +2     
=========================================
+ Hits           5006     5008    +2     
  Misses          166      166           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@iifawzi
Copy link
Contributor

iifawzi commented Aug 26, 2024

Super 🚀 , thank you!

Copy link
Contributor

@iifawzi iifawzi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@niconoe-
Copy link
Contributor Author

@MauricioFauth As you merged #575, I think you can also merge this one.

I know there are 2 failing chekcs but these are because of benchmarks not being properly configured. That's fixed on 5.10.x branch, and out of this scope.

Thanks 🙂

@MauricioFauth MauricioFauth self-assigned this Aug 26, 2024
@williamdes williamdes added this to the 5.10.0 milestone Aug 27, 2024
@niconoe- niconoe- deleted the fix/5.9.x-missing-with-parser-token branch September 3, 2024 13:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants