Skip to content

Clarified parameterization of AR1 model in AR notebook #4063

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 18, 2020
Merged

Clarified parameterization of AR1 model in AR notebook #4063

merged 6 commits into from
Nov 18, 2020

Conversation

fonnesbeck
Copy link
Member

The AR notebook conflates the precision and variance in the description and data simulation steps. I've updated the notebook to make it consistent.

Closes #4059

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

Review Jupyter notebook visual diffs & provide feedback on notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 22, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #4063 (87adbc7) into master (f732a01) will decrease coverage by 2.07%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4063      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.91%   86.83%   -2.08%     
==========================================
  Files          89       88       -1     
  Lines       14429    14165     -264     
==========================================
- Hits        12829    12300     -529     
- Misses       1600     1865     +265     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pymc3/distributions/discrete.py 74.65% <0.00%> (-22.56%) ⬇️
pymc3/distributions/timeseries.py 71.93% <0.00%> (-13.87%) ⬇️
pymc3/distributions/continuous.py 80.09% <0.00%> (-13.07%) ⬇️
pymc3/distributions/multivariate.py 78.17% <0.00%> (-3.03%) ⬇️
pymc3/distributions/mixture.py 86.48% <0.00%> (-2.87%) ⬇️
pymc3/tests/models.py 85.95% <0.00%> (-1.82%) ⬇️
pymc3/tuning/starting.py 80.91% <0.00%> (-0.91%) ⬇️
pymc3/tuning/scaling.py 57.40% <0.00%> (-0.78%) ⬇️
pymc3/util.py 93.75% <0.00%> (-0.64%) ⬇️
pymc3/model.py 88.95% <0.00%> (-0.39%) ⬇️
... and 69 more

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

View / edit / reply to this conversation on ReviewNB

twiecki commented on 2020-08-23T17:21:42Z
----------------------------------------------------------------

nice to have the version output.


@review-notebook-app
Copy link

View / edit / reply to this conversation on ReviewNB

twiecki commented on 2020-08-23T17:21:43Z
----------------------------------------------------------------

How does it sample with default tuning?


@review-notebook-app
Copy link

View / edit / reply to this conversation on ReviewNB

twiecki commented on 2020-08-23T17:21:44Z
----------------------------------------------------------------

also here good to have output


@review-notebook-app
Copy link

View / edit / reply to this conversation on ReviewNB

AlexAndorra commented on 2020-08-24T11:13:57Z
----------------------------------------------------------------

This small text needs to be upated too


+ the PyMC3 version is already shown in the watermark output at the end
+ a few small changes in the text of the cells that
@michaelosthege
Copy link
Member

I just made the change requested in the review and removed the print of the PyMC3 version, because that's already covered by the watermark at the end of the notebook.

Hope this pushes it over the finish line?

@twiecki
Copy link
Member

twiecki commented Nov 18, 2020

@michaelosthege LGTM but merge conflict :-/

@twiecki twiecki merged commit 4013462 into pymc-devs:master Nov 18, 2020
@MarcoGorelli MarcoGorelli mentioned this pull request Nov 18, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Confusion of precision and variance in autoregression (AR) example
3 participants