Skip to content

Dont use value for determining any type #106

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 24, 2019
Merged

Dont use value for determining any type #106

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 24, 2019

Conversation

benhowes
Copy link
Contributor

otherwise Falsy values are not valid types

otherwise Falsy values are not valid types
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 11, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #106 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #106   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.32%   96.32%           
=======================================
  Files          54       54           
  Lines        1441     1441           
=======================================
  Hits         1388     1388           
  Misses         53       53
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
openapi_core/schema/schemas/models.py 94.19% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update db5d825...3d29268. Read the comment docs.

@p1c2u
Copy link
Collaborator

p1c2u commented Feb 24, 2019

@benhowes thank you for the contribution

@p1c2u p1c2u merged commit d07a9d0 into python-openapi:master Feb 24, 2019
@benhowes benhowes deleted the patch-1 branch February 25, 2019 08:27
bjmc pushed a commit to bjmc/openapi-core that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2019
Dont use value for determining any type
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants