datetime.rst: improve combine() docs #101338
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The explanation on handling of `datetime` as the `date` arg was confusingly mixed with an unrelated item, and lacked proper arg name formatting.
belm0
commented
Jan 26, 2023
|
is it worth a backport to 3.11? |
mdboom
pushed a commit
to mdboom/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2023
The explanation on handling of datetime as the date arg was confusingly mixed with an unrelated item, and lacked proper arg name formatting.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The explanation on handling of
datetimeas thedatearg was confusingly mixed with an unrelated item, and lacked proper arg name formatting.