[3.12] gh-111112: Avoid potential confusion in TCP server example. (GH-111113) #114831
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Improve misleading TCP server docs and example.
socket.recv(), as documented by the Python reference documentation,
returns at most
bufsize
bytes, and the underlying TCP protocol meansthere is no guaranteed correspondence between what is sent by the client
and what is received by the server.
This conflation could mislead readers into thinking that TCP is
datagram-based or has similar semantics, which will likely appear to
work for simple cases, but introduce difficult to reproduce bugs.
(cherry picked from commit a79a272)
Co-authored-by: Aidan Holm [email protected]
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--114831.org.readthedocs.build/