Skip to content

gh-128759: Fix accesses to tp_version_tag. #129750

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 12, 2025

Conversation

colesbury
Copy link
Contributor

@colesbury colesbury commented Feb 6, 2025

We should use a relaxed atomic load in the free threading build in PyType_Modified() because that's called without the type lock held. It's not necessary to use atomics in type_modified_unlocked().

We should also use FT_ATOMIC_STORE_UINT_RELAXED() instead of the UINT32 variant because tp_version_tag is declared as unsigned int.

We should use a relaxed atomic load in the free threading build in
`PyType_Modified()` because that's called without the type lock held.
It's not necessary to use atomics in `type_modified_unlocked()`.

We should also use `FT_ATOMIC_STORE_UINT_RELAXED()` instead of the
`UINT32` variant because `tp_version_tag` is declared as `unsigned int`.
@colesbury colesbury merged commit 57f45ee into python:main Feb 12, 2025
51 checks passed
@colesbury colesbury deleted the gh-128759-tp-version-tag branch February 12, 2025 14:34
@miss-islington-app
Copy link

Thanks @colesbury for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.13.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@miss-islington-app
Copy link

Sorry, @colesbury, I could not cleanly backport this to 3.13 due to a conflict.
Please backport using cherry_picker on command line.

cherry_picker 57f45ee2d8ee23c2a1d1daba4095a5a044169419 3.13

colesbury added a commit to colesbury/cpython that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2025
…29750)

We should use a relaxed atomic load in the free threading build in
`PyType_Modified()` because that's called without the type lock held.
It's not necessary to use atomics in `type_modified_unlocked()`.

We should also use `FT_ATOMIC_STORE_UINT_RELAXED()` instead of the
`UINT32` variant because `tp_version_tag` is declared as `unsigned int`.
(cherry picked from commit 57f45ee)

Co-authored-by: Sam Gross <[email protected]>
@bedevere-app
Copy link

bedevere-app bot commented Feb 12, 2025

GH-130042 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.13 branch.

@bedevere-app bedevere-app bot removed the needs backport to 3.13 bugs and security fixes label Feb 12, 2025
colesbury added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2025
…30042)

We should use a relaxed atomic load in the free threading build in
`PyType_Modified()` because that's called without the type lock held.
It's not necessary to use atomics in `type_modified_unlocked()`.

We should also use `FT_ATOMIC_STORE_UINT_RELAXED()` instead of the
`UINT32` variant because `tp_version_tag` is declared as `unsigned int`.
(cherry picked from commit 57f45ee)
@colesbury colesbury removed their assignment Feb 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants