Skip to content

bpo-36189: Fixing typo in tutorial introduction #13090

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 4, 2019

Conversation

jonyucra
Copy link
Contributor

@jonyucra jonyucra commented May 4, 2019

@the-knights-who-say-ni
Copy link

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Our records indicate we have not received your CLA. For legal reasons we need you to sign this before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

If you have recently signed the CLA, please wait at least one business day
before our records are updated.

You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received.

Thanks again for your contribution, we look forward to reviewing it!

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added docs Documentation in the Doc dir awaiting review labels May 4, 2019
@csabella csabella merged commit 98a1e06 into python:master May 4, 2019
@csabella
Copy link
Contributor

csabella commented May 4, 2019

Thanks for the PR! 🎉

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @jonyucra for the PR, and @csabella for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.7.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request May 5, 2019
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-13093 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.7 branch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants