Skip to content

[3.8] bpo-36871: Ensure method signature is used when asserting mock calls to a method (GH13261) #15578

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 29, 2019

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Aug 29, 2019

  • Fix call_matcher for mock when using methods

  • Add NEWS entry

  • Use None check and convert doctest to unittest

  • Use better name for mock in tests. Handle _SpecState when the attribute was not accessed and add tests.

  • Use reset_mock instead of reinitialization. Change inner class constructor signature for check

  • Reword comment regarding call object lookup logic
    (cherry picked from commit c961278)

Co-authored-by: Xtreak [email protected]

https://bugs.python.org/issue36871

…to a method (GH13261)

* Fix call_matcher for mock when using methods

* Add NEWS entry

* Use None check and convert doctest to unittest

* Use better name for mock in tests. Handle _SpecState when the attribute was not accessed and add tests.

* Use reset_mock instead of reinitialization. Change inner class constructor signature for check

* Reword comment regarding call object lookup logic
(cherry picked from commit c961278)

Co-authored-by: Xtreak <[email protected]>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tirkarthi and @cjw296: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

2 similar comments
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tirkarthi and @cjw296: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tirkarthi and @cjw296: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants