Skip to content

[3.7] bpo-36871: Ensure method signature is used when asserting mock calls to a method (GH13261) #16372

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Sep 25, 2019

  • Fix call_matcher for mock when using methods

  • Add NEWS entry

  • Use None check and convert doctest to unittest

  • Use better name for mock in tests. Handle _SpecState when the attribute was not accessed and add tests.

  • Use reset_mock instead of reinitialization. Change inner class constructor signature for check

  • Reword comment regarding call object lookup logic
    (cherry picked from commit c961278)

Co-authored-by: Xtreak [email protected]

https://bugs.python.org/issue36871

…to a method (GH13261)

* Fix call_matcher for mock when using methods

* Add NEWS entry

* Use None check and convert doctest to unittest

* Use better name for mock in tests. Handle _SpecState when the attribute was not accessed and add tests.

* Use reset_mock instead of reinitialization. Change inner class constructor signature for check

* Reword comment regarding call object lookup logic
(cherry picked from commit c961278)

Co-authored-by: Xtreak <[email protected]>
@gpshead
Copy link
Member

gpshead commented Sep 25, 2019

already applied in #15577

@gpshead gpshead closed this Sep 25, 2019
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-c961278-3.7 branch September 25, 2019 04:13
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tirkarthi and @cjw296: Status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tirkarthi and @cjw296: Status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants