-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.2k
bpo-38623: Add note about site module (site-packages) #16974
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
ambv
merged 3 commits into
python:main
from
bittner:feature/mention-site-module-in-docs
Sep 23, 2021
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I feel this is just a noise for tutorial readers.
We don't introduce even standard library (it is introduced in 6.2). So we shouldn't mention about what is in the "installation-dependent default" in this chapter. It should be just "some other directories" for the readers here.
If you really want to document site-packages, I think Python Setup and Usage or Installing Python Modules is better place.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not clear to the reader what "handled" means here. What would a reader of the tutorial do with the site module?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would "taken care of [by ...]" be better, maybe? This is mainly a referral to the first paragraph of the site module documentation, which says:
The tutorial reader, which may be someone having landed here by organic search traffic (i.e. not necessarily a Python novice), may get a hint on what "installation-dependent default[s]" are (via "
site-packages
") and where to read more about it (via the link to thesite
module documentation).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess i don't understand why any reader needs to know what module placed site-packages into the import path? Just because someone might land on this page through a search doesn't mean we should add every fact to it. The tutorial should first and foremost be useful to read by beginners. This addition seems like a confusing addition.