Skip to content

bpo-39313: Add an option to RefactoringTool for using exec as a function #17967

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 12, 2020

Conversation

isidentical
Copy link
Member

@isidentical isidentical commented Jan 12, 2020

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

@isidentical isidentical changed the title bpo-39313: Add an option to RefactoringTool for using no_print_and_exec_statement bpo-39313: Add an option to RefactoringTool for using exec as a function Jan 12, 2020
@isidentical
Copy link
Member Author

I have made the requested changes; please review again

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

Thanks for making the requested changes!

@pablogsal: please review the changes made to this pull request.

Copy link
Member

@pablogsal pablogsal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LCTM

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@isidentical: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit 61b1415 into python:master Jan 12, 2020
shihai1991 pushed a commit to shihai1991/cpython that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants