Skip to content

bpo-29981: Update Index for set, dict, and generator 'comprehensions' #20272

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Oct 20, 2020

Conversation

DahlitzFlorian
Copy link
Contributor

@DahlitzFlorian DahlitzFlorian commented May 20, 2020

A similar PR (#995) was made back in 2017, but was closed due to inactivity. With this PR I propose nearly the same changes.

@terryjreedy mentioned that he does not like the "all or part of" phrase. As the already existing list comprehension's glossary entry has a similar phrasing, I suggest to keep it.

I build the changes locally and the index was updated accordingly.

https://bugs.python.org/issue29981

Copy link
Contributor

@remilapeyre remilapeyre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for improving the documentation @DahlitzFlorian !

Co-authored-by: Rémi Lapeyre <[email protected]>
@DahlitzFlorian
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @remilapeyre for the review! I applied some of your suggestions. However, I would not change Use to Using as Use is the imperative form and highly preferred. See also: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/995/files#r120774265

Copy link
Contributor

@akuchling akuchling left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The text reads well. I only noticed two minor grammar corrections. Thanks!

@akuchling akuchling self-assigned this Jun 11, 2020
@DahlitzFlorian
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the review @akuchling, I applied the requested changes.

@DahlitzFlorian
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for accepting the PR @akuchling! Is there anything left to do or can it be merged?

@akuchling
Copy link
Contributor

@DahlitzFlorian: on re-reviewing this, can you please move the 'Sets/Dicts can be created...' paragraphs in stdtypes.rst so they come after the paragraph that begins "Return a set/dict"? I think it reads oddly to have the second paragraph begin "Return ".

@DahlitzFlorian
Copy link
Contributor Author

@akuchling changed it accordingly, thanks for the hint!

@terryjreedy
Copy link
Member

Without looking at the resulting html, the additions look good to me. I think this should have a news entry such as:
"Improve documentation of sets and dicts, including new glossary entries for dictionary and set comprehensions."

@akuchling
Copy link
Contributor

I think most documentation changes don't need a news entry, unless they're doing something large like adding a section or a whole new document. "Improved docs on topic X" doesn't tell you very much, and users don't need to modify code to accommodate doc changes.

@akuchling akuchling merged commit 2d55aa9 into python:master Oct 20, 2020
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @DahlitzFlorian for the PR, and @akuchling for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.8, 3.9.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-22836 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.9 only security fixes label Oct 20, 2020
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2020
… comprehensions'(pythonGH-20272)

Co-authored-by: Rémi Lapeyre <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 2d55aa9)

Co-authored-by: Florian Dahlitz <[email protected]>
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-22837 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.8 branch.

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2020
… comprehensions'(pythonGH-20272)

Co-authored-by: Rémi Lapeyre <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 2d55aa9)

Co-authored-by: Florian Dahlitz <[email protected]>
@terryjreedy
Copy link
Member

I have a lower threshhold -- is something added that users might want to read. But whoever does the work to push a PR over the finish line gets to decide.

@DahlitzFlorian
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the guidance @remilapeyre and @akuchling 🎉

@DahlitzFlorian DahlitzFlorian deleted the fix-issue-29981 branch October 21, 2020 05:44
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2020
… comprehensions'(GH-20272)

Co-authored-by: Rémi Lapeyre <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 2d55aa9)

Co-authored-by: Florian Dahlitz <[email protected]>
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2020
… comprehensions'(GH-20272)

Co-authored-by: Rémi Lapeyre <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 2d55aa9)

Co-authored-by: Florian Dahlitz <[email protected]>
adorilson pushed a commit to adorilson/cpython that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants