Skip to content

bpo-40878: xlc cannot handle C99 extern inline #21887

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 15, 2020

Conversation

skrah
Copy link
Contributor

@skrah skrah commented Aug 15, 2020

@skrah skrah requested a review from rhettinger as a code owner August 15, 2020 12:37
@skrah skrah changed the title xlc cannot handle C99 extern inline bpo-40878: xlc cannot handle C99 extern inline Aug 15, 2020
@skrah skrah removed the skip issue label Aug 15, 2020
@skrah skrah merged commit 40e700a into python:master Aug 15, 2020
@skrah skrah added needs backport to 3.9 only security fixes and removed skip news labels Aug 15, 2020
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @skrah for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.9.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-21891 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.9 only security fixes label Aug 15, 2020
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2020
This applies to the default "extc99" mode.  Python does not compile with "stdc99".
(cherry picked from commit 40e700a)

Co-authored-by: Stefan Krah <[email protected]>
@skrah skrah deleted the xlc_build_fix branch August 15, 2020 18:39
shihai1991 pushed a commit to shihai1991/cpython that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2020
This applies to the default "extc99" mode.  Python does not compile with "stdc99".
xzy3 pushed a commit to xzy3/cpython that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2020
This applies to the default "extc99" mode.  Python does not compile with "stdc99".
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants