Skip to content

[3.9] Minor wording change in concurrent.futures. (GH-23194) #23195

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 8, 2020

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes a grammar problem by adding a missing "as", and clarifies the wording of the valid ranges for max_workers.
(cherry picked from commit fd6f6fa)

Co-authored-by: Don Kirkby [email protected]

Fixes a grammar problem by adding a missing "as", and clarifies the wording of the valid ranges for max_workers.
(cherry picked from commit fd6f6fa)

Co-authored-by: Don Kirkby <[email protected]>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@donkirkby and @asvetlov: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@donkirkby and @asvetlov: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit 2e5bd4f into python:3.9 Nov 8, 2020
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-fd6f6fa-3.9 branch November 8, 2020 09:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip issue skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants